The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Even the quote that you've picked doesn't that they all were! <laugh>
"All that I've seen" doesn't equal "everyone that voted Leave", does it?
As I've already pointed out, you'd already claimed that it hadn't influenced anyone.

You keep saying that you've given examples and then refusing to pick one, for some reason.
Just pick one out. It's not hard, is it? Stop going off on a tangent and pretending to be a victim.

I'm not the one going off on a tangent, and I certainly don't feel like a victim. I'm more an amused bystander.

Fair play for now admitting that you were wrong with your claim. It's taken you a while, but there it is. <ok>

To get it back on the track you're trying desperately to drift from. You asked me why I voted as I did. I told you. You've since been telling me why you know me better and I'm wrong, and claim I voted because of lies I was told, which is simply bollocks, as I've explained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRH Custard VC
I'm not the one going off on a tangent, and I certainly don't feel like a victim. I'm more an amused bystander.

Fair play for now admitting that you were wrong with your claim. It's taken you a while, but there it is. <ok>

To get it back on the track you're trying desperately to drift from. You asked me why I voted as I did. I told you. You've since been telling me why you know me better and I'm wrong, and claim I voted because of lies I was told, which is simply bollocks, as I've explained.
Do you actually ever read people's comments or do you just make **** up and run with it?
I've pointed out exactly where and why you're wrong, yet you've taken that as an admission of error, for some reason.
Have you been at the David Icke crystals, again?

I didn't and haven't asked you why you've voted the way that you did.
I pointed out that I hadn't seen any good arguments for the Leave vote and I still haven't.
Your repeated refusal to pick a single remain lie is quite obvious, by the way. Why is that?
 
Even the quote that you've picked doesn't that they all were! <laugh>
"All that I've seen" doesn't equal "everyone that voted Leave", does it?
As I've already pointed out, you'd already claimed that it hadn't influenced anyone.

You keep saying that you've given examples and then refusing to pick one, for some reason.
Just pick one out. It's not hard, is it? Stop going off on a tangent and pretending to be a victim.
You're wasting your time mate.

However, what he might like to research is the reasons given for voting out. The NHS for example was high on the list of considerations for a large proportion of the Leave vote.

Of course the £350m a week claim that was a lie, and will therefore never materialise . They were duped, by Tory tossers - the end.

Denying a decent sized proportion of the electorate fell for the spin, because he doesn't like the idea of being in the same bucket as gullible morons, is just another example of his complete delusion.

The 5 minute expert on seemingly everything.
 
I'm not the one going off on a tangent, and I certainly don't feel like a victim. I'm more an amused bystander.

Fair play for now admitting that you were wrong with your claim. It's taken you a while, but there it is. <ok>

To get it back on the track you're trying desperately to drift from. You asked me why I voted as I did. I told you. You've since been telling me why you know me better and I'm wrong, and claim I voted because of lies I was told, which is simply bollocks, as I've explained.
You need to check the definition of that word!
 
Do you actually ever read people's comments or do you just make **** up and run with it?
I've pointed out exactly where and why you're wrong, yet you've taken that as an admission of error, for some reason.
Have you been at the David Icke crystals, again?

I didn't and haven't asked you why you've voted the way that you did.
I pointed out that I hadn't seen any good arguments for the Leave vote and I still haven't.
Your repeated refusal to pick a single remain lie is quite obvious, by the way. Why is that?

Perhaps not, if you want to be pedantic, but it comes pretty close when you ask

"What are the main real arguments for leaving?"

and respond to the reply with the Royal we:

"Can you give us something specific? "

:emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Perhaps not, if you want to be pedantic, but it comes pretty close when you ask

"What are the main real arguments for leaving?"

and respond to the reply with the Royal we:

"Can you give us something specific? "

:emoticon-0105-wink:
I'm glad that we agree that I'm right.
Any chance of you actually answering either of those questions at any point, while we're at it?
Probably not, eh?
 
You're wasting your time mate.

However, what he might like to research is the reasons given for voting out. The NHS for example was high on the list of considerations for a large proportion of the Leave vote.

Of course the £350m a week claim that was a lie, and will therefore never materialise . They were duped, by Tory tossers - the end.

Denying a decent sized proportion of the electorate fell for the spin, because he doesn't like the idea of being in the same bucket as gullible morons, is just another example of his complete delusion.

The 5 minute expert on seemingly everything.


<laugh>

Aye up, along comes another clueless **** wit, that knows why people really voted as they did, no matter what they may say differently. <laugh>
 
I'm glad that we agree that I'm right.
Any chance of you actually answering either of those questions at any point, while we're at it?
Probably not, eh?

Answer them again? You're right, probably not.

You could always just pretend I'd answered them, you ignore them anyway, or assume you know what I think better than I do. <laugh>
 
Answer them again? You're right, probably not.

You could always just pretend I'd answered them, you ignore them anyway, or assume you know what I think better than I do. <laugh>
That'll be the paranoia, again. Am I a vampiric space lizard or a sheeple, by the way?
 
About ten years ago I saw Alan Sugar outside of the US Embassy in Grosvenor Square. There's often a massive queue of people waiting to get through security to sort out visas etc. Because of who I was working for at the time, I had security clearance so could go through the fast track, a bit like Disneyland and the Fast Pass system. Poor old Alan was being treated like a commoner and he actually uttered the immortal words "do you know who I am?".

What a tool.

... being of sparkingly quit wit I would have responded with "Tatum Lyle?" had he asked me <whistle>
 
That'll be the paranoia, again. Am I a vampiric space lizard or a sheeple, by the way?

I don't know. Perhaps the other mental patient on here could offer the wisdom of his personal experience and help you with your afflictions.

Fair play, owning up to them is the first step towards recovery.

Good luck, I hope all goes well. <ok>
 
I don't know. Perhaps the other mental patient on here could offer the wisdom of his personal experience and help you with your afflictions.

Fair play, owning up to them is the first step towards recovery.

Good luck, I hope all goes well. <ok>
Wait, do you lot believe in psychiatry? Shouldn't you be recommending some homeopathic brew or something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan
City fans? We believe in any brew, as long as it produces enough alcohol.

Or do you mean users of Google search engines?
Yeah, don't let the lizard people know who follows Icke. That must be one of your rules, eh?
Don't worry. Your secret's safe with the not606 prem board. <ok>
 
The lightning comes from different gods so it's best to be prepared.

Whoops, ****ed up the first reply...hang on.

Anyone going to heaven, has to have really long legs, because there are only three steps, so they must be ****ing massive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.