The EU debate - Part II

I'm not the one going off on a tangent, and I certainly don't feel like a victim. I'm more an amused bystander.

Fair play for now admitting that you were wrong with your claim. It's taken you a while, but there it is.

To get it back on the track you're trying desperately to drift from. You asked me why I voted as I did. I told you. You've since been telling me why you know me better and I'm wrong, and claim I voted because of lies I was told, which is simply bollocks, as I've explained.

 

Do you actually ever read people's comments or do you just make **** up and run with it?
I've pointed out exactly where and why you're wrong, yet you've taken that as an admission of error, for some reason.
Have you been at the David Icke crystals, again?

I didn't and haven't asked you why you've voted the way that you did.
I pointed out that I hadn't seen any good arguments for the Leave vote and I still haven't.
Your repeated refusal to pick a single remain lie is quite obvious, by the way. Why is that?

 

You're wasting your time mate.

However, what he might like to research is the reasons given for voting out. The NHS for example was high on the list of considerations for a large proportion of the Leave vote.

Of course the £350m a week claim that was a lie, and will therefore never materialise . They were duped, by Tory tossers - the end.

Denying a decent sized proportion of the electorate fell for the spin, because he doesn't like the idea of being in the same bucket as gullible morons, is just another example of his complete delusion.

The 5 minute expert on seemingly everything.

 

You need to check the definition of that word!

 

Perhaps not, if you want to be pedantic, but it comes pretty close when you ask

"What are the main real arguments for leaving?"

and respond to the reply with the Royal we:

"Can you give us something specific? "

 

I'm glad that we agree that I'm right.
Any chance of you actually answering either of those questions at any point, while we're at it?
Probably not, eh?

 

Aye up, along comes another clueless **** wit, that knows why people really voted as they did, no matter what they may say differently.

 

I was only responding to your use of a banner headline to create a false picture. Similar to much of Vote Leave's campaign really.

 

Answer them again? You're right, probably not.

You could always just pretend I'd answered them, you ignore them anyway, or assume you know what I think better than I do.

 

Quite probably. I've obviously misunderstood the meaning of "lightning" too, unless it's profound irony.

 

That'll be the paranoia, again. Am I a vampiric space lizard or a sheeple, by the way?

 

... being of sparkingly quit wit I would have responded with "Tatum Lyle?" had he asked me

 

I don't know. Perhaps the other mental patient on here could offer the wisdom of his personal experience and help you with your afflictions.

Fair play, owning up to them is the first step towards recovery.

Good luck, I hope all goes well.

 

Wait, do you lot believe in psychiatry? Shouldn't you be recommending some homeopathic brew or something?

 

... whilst iron might act as a conductor it is not exclusive ... even really serious and down to earth iron ... although the earth dynamic, by definition, can mitigate the risk somewhat ...

 

City fans? We believe in any brew, as long as it produces enough alcohol.

Or do you mean users of Google search engines?

 

Do you think it shows a lack of faith for churches to have lightning conductors?

 

Yeah, don't let the lizard people know who follows Icke. That must be one of your rules, eh?
Don't worry. Your secret's safe with the not606 prem board.

 

The lightning comes from different gods so it's best to be prepared.

 

Whoops, ****ed up the first reply...hang on.

Anyone going to heaven, has to have really long legs, because there are only three steps, so they must be ****ing massive.