The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
PleaseNotPoll said:
I think you've been hearing voices, to be honest. Don't do anything that they tell you to do, ok?
Click to expand...


Thanks for sharing the wisdom of your experience, if the voices ever start, I hope I can remember your advice. <ok>
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
I will admit that adapting to try and deal with some of your warped logic is difficult. sometimes.

But I seem to be managing so far.
Click to expand...

You were doing so well, then we see the delusions kicking in again.

Perhaps you could try posting something about the topic this thread is about, instead of this funny little game that you're struggling to play?
 
Can't we get Donald Trump to run our country,great entertainment every day.........
Would love to see him do PM's question time with all the hormonal lefty's going ape ****.<laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRH Custard VC
Tobes said:
We were talking about businesses applying for grants, not research or farming subsidies i.e. SME's applying for ERDF funding, you know nothing bullshitter.

I see Google was the extent of your 'knowledge', and 'your people' obviously reside in the internet. No wonder you didn't want to share their credentials.
Click to expand...


I missed this one earlier. We weren't limited to business, you may well have been though. You're trying to limit it, because you realise you've ****ed up yet again and want to narrow it down and change the point.

Google isn't the extent of my knowledge. I posted the link to show that the people that decide these things agree with what I put. Seemingly the EU themselves are not high enough up the chain of EU funding to be seen as credible by you.

I simply quoted it to show you that your future ex knowing about one area, doesn't mean it applies to all, which is what I'd said. Her role certainly doesn't give your words much credence.

I might develop a hobby to scour the boards to try to find a debate that you've turned into a battle, and actually won. I reckon there's liable to be a unicorn grazing near me if I find it. <laugh>
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
Nice to know you're reading in coming along.

Next try to work on understanding! <ok>
Click to expand...


Aye, I can do most small words without mixing up an "n" for an "s". :emoticon-0105-wink:

Sometimes I manage to read quotes before some noddy realises it's ****e, and tries to delete it and deny it was there. Some of these noddies are so dense, they don't realise it stays if someone quotes it, and so try to argue it doesn't exist. Fancy that.

Do you know anyone that would be that ridiculous? :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Aye, I can do most small words without mixing up an "n" for an "s". :emoticon-0105-wink:

Sometimes I manage to read quotes before some noddy realises it's ****e, and tries to delete it and deny it was there. Some of these noddies are so dense, they don't realise it stays if someone quotes it, and so try to argue it doesn't exist. Fancy that.

Do you know anyone that would be that ridiculous? :emoticon-0102-bigsm
Click to expand...

In fact, I'm talking to somebody who's infinitely more ridiculous right now! <ok>

( note, requisite emoticon included )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back