The EU debate - Part II
- Thread starter PINKIE
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Hey, don't insult the Spurs retirement home, NSIS.Sounds like she might come from Hull!
Apple certainly got bitten today.
The reality is that Ireland made the Faustian pact to get those firms
have their "HQs" there and some jobs in return for being the funnel neck
for tax avoidance where the money does not even touch the parts of the
funnel actually in Ireland.
To deal with the "virtual" businesses, some accountants suggest a transaction tax
is probably required. Similarly suggested is a "field office" regime (as in telecoms)
to prevent them claiming losses in countries where they claim they are not based
or taxable.
The reality is that Ireland made the Faustian pact to get those firms
have their "HQs" there and some jobs in return for being the funnel neck
for tax avoidance where the money does not even touch the parts of the
funnel actually in Ireland.
To deal with the "virtual" businesses, some accountants suggest a transaction tax
is probably required. Similarly suggested is a "field office" regime (as in telecoms)
to prevent them claiming losses in countries where they claim they are not based
or taxable.
You don't even believe what you say do you? You just spout a load of lies. It's second nature to you. "Internet wealth", "internet wife" - at least I speak the true and am happy whereas you are so unhappy you have to talk about a pretend life and be critical of real people who have real lives but you spread lies. You did it with that blog and you do it with a "garage".
Yeh, you come across as someone who is really happy. A proper day at the beach
Is that with or without utilising after their death as much of their body parts as is
medically viable ??
Anybody who feels the need to insult from the safety of their computer.
In England and Wales from2000/1 through to 2010/1 there were 35 convicted killers ( for murder and manslaughter) who were convicted of killing again ( 29 murders and 6 manslaughters). During that time there were about 8000 homicides. On average then 3.5 homicides were committed per years by released prisoners. That is about an 18 million to one chance of you being killed by a released murderer as opposed to a 70,000 to one chance of being murdered by anybody else. The chance of an innocent man being murdered by the state due to a wrong conviction assuming only two errors per year would be about 250 to one. There in statistical terms is an arguement against the return of capital punishment to go along with the moral arguement.
I know they're all at it. The Dutch, Danes etc.
Just can't trust those foreigners.
You may not use swear words you fat **** but you insult anyone who disagrees with your views you fat ****.
I'm so unhappy.
I'm very comfortable, thanks Pete. And that includes allowing you to believe what you want to believe...
Apart from that, WTF are you babbling on about?....
Do you think you insult people in any way shape or form on here?
Edit: just read Stan's response.
You don't seem to understand how to use statistics. You've totally ignored the population in each of those statistics. It's like quoting the statistics about the likelihood of being murdered by somebody who knows you and deciding it's best to avoid everybody you know.
- Status