The EU debate - Part II

He IS afraid to voice his true opinions that's why he hides behind liking others. To answer his question, it's simple... because deep down, he knows it's wrong

 

Sometimes the truth is closer to fiction than you realise https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manston_Airport

 

can I please have some more abuse from the "USUAL SUSPECTS".Its what I enjoy most about this site,and it keeps me posting.

 

abuse

whooooooooooosh!

 

Knew you'd be first!....you thick,sad moron.

 

The irony

You asked a question and not one poster who responded said anything that could be construed as abuse. They were simply holding a mirror up to your shortcomings.

In fact the only one hurling abuse is you. At me, now. Keep it coming though... "it keeps me posting"

 

Has anyone abused you? Looks more like people are calling a spade a spade (poor choice of words possibly ).

If you condone bigotry, people will be inclined to think you're a bigot, especially if it happens regularly.

 

Number2 can do so much better than that..... The thick,pikey ****.

 

Looks like the cat is out of the bag
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-fury-as-eu-leaders-consider-uk-emergency-bra

Perhaps we can stick to the discussion rather than spending more effort trying to close another thread down

 

John Redwood's assertion that brexit means 'taking back control' is a dumb myth anyway. Far from taking back control, the govt will contract out the trade negotiations to big accountancy firms like KPMG, Deloitte, PricewatershouseCoppers and Ernst & Young, because they simply do not have the resources to do it within the civil service. It's the exact opposite of 'taking back control', we're about to farm out out decision making process to private financial companies.

 

The Guardian goes into it in a bit more depth. It sounds like a kind of semi- Brexit. We stay in the single market and are granted a temporary brake on immigration in return.

We would still have to make a substantial contribution to the EU budget. We would also lose our seat at the table when major decisions on EU policy are made.

Sounds like a heavy price just to limit immigration from the EU.

 

It's a rubbish deal, but as I mentioned on the other thread it has a lot going for it politically. Scotland can claim to still be in Europe, the Ireland border can remain largely unchanged, eu trade remains unaffected and immigration can be said to be controlled. The seven years suggested will allow time to rebuild the trade agreements we had when part of the EU and build new ones independent of the EU. It might even give time to negotiate a new deal with Europe whilst in the EEA (that's what the politicians will say).

 

Agreed. It sucks, on the face of it.

If it happens I guess we'll be conceding that what Brexit was all about was immigration all along. When immigration from the EU never seemed to be the main problem, anyway.

 

I had forgotten about UIR, these two Europe threads would have been a hoot

 

You DO remember the effect he had on me?!

 

Another day,another bomber.... Must be great being a German in Germany.

 

Yup or a person in France, Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Sudan, Libya, Yemen - the worlds going to ****. It Could we'll get a lot worse as well

 

I should add the race war currently going on in the States to this list as well

 

You silly ****.