The EU debate - Part II

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope you don't take this as a dig but I find your views confusing.
You liked a post which describes Islam as a cancer because some Muslims have committed terrorism yet describe most Christians as being tolerant even though we have had a long history of violence committed by Christians in this country, in Europe, the USA and Africa and Asia.
Before 9/11 the biggest terrorist incidents in America involved right wing Christian militia. In the 1960s and 70s the terrorist issue in the uk was solely Christian based with Ireland.

Around the world gay people have been persecuted as have Jewish people as have those with HIV. Abortion clinics have been bombed and people in them shot...all by christians.
Horrible ****s with horrible ideas will use anything to justify their poisonous hate. Look at the Yorkshire ripper...he claimed his christian God ordered him to slaughter all those women.
I think it would be ****ty to use these things to label Christianity as a cancer (implying that christians are a problem) but you liked a post that does this to Islam.

I like some of your posts so am not seeking to slagging you off...just trying get to understand
I think i've liked all of his posts,not because i agree with him but because he's sticking to his opinion
and he's entitled to.I agree all religions have problem followers.
 
Well my opinion is this country is seen as a christian country.

Fair enough. This comment isnt aimed at you, but i know quite a few people who call themselves Christians but dont ever go to church and dont live by a lot of its teachings, or least any that would inconvience their lives - ie no sex before marriage, no blaspheming, no coveting other peoples wives, no lust, greed or envy ect but even though they dont actually practice the religion, go to church or help support it they still call themselves Christians.

My personal opinion is that im glad most school education is secular, that people have the freedom to have whatever belief they want, to have sex before marriage if they do or dont want, people have equal legal status no matter of sexual orientation, belief, or marital status.

But again these are just my beliefs.
 
I call bullshit. You don't like a post likening Islam to a Cancer, because somebody is 'sticking to their opinion'
Agreed. It was more of a "you said what I really think, but am afraid to verbalise" imo.

If you didn't agree with such a strong racist post, you'd not want the association you'd get from liking it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Agreed. It was more of a "you said what I really think, but am afraid to verbalise" imo.

If you didn't agree with such a strong racist post, you'd not want the association you'd get from liking it.

He did the same with StanDMan on our board. He said numbnuts was smart to say Mourinho would go on to be more successful at United than Fergie. When asked whether it was smart to agree with a poster who only last season was calling for Mourinho to be sacked, poor old armchairblue ran out of excuses.

It's such a stupid stance, it's like me agreeing to everything UIR posted ffs <doh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.