Show me any post where I have rated Bent over Defoe.
I'll save you an effort - you won't find one, because I have never written one.
Like most here, I thought Bent was not good enough for our squad, but the difference is, I put him on the same level as Defoe (not higher), and I, therefore, refuse to have a pop at Bent without reserving the exact same criticisms for Defoe.
People seem to look at Defoe through pink-tinted spectacles, and I have never understood it. Never will. Any half decent striker, given the chances that Defoe has been given with Spurs, will score goals. The questions that need to be answered, though, how many goals, how frequently, and how many games won?
If our ambitions, over the time that Defoe has been with us, stop at "Top 5," then he has been partially successful, because we have finished in the Top 5 for part of his career with us (though not enough times for me to consider him a great striker). If our ambitions have been CL footy and/or the occasional tournament trophy (not merely the one Milk Cup), then he has been an abject failure (just as Bent was).
And mine wasn't a "rant," it was an attempt at a reasoned argument. I can assure you that I was both sober and calm when I wrote my OP.