Everyone's entitled to their own perspective on this but I was talking to a season ticket holder about two months ago and he said " Go ahead,liquidate us but as far I'm concerned it will still be Rangers. We'll be playing at Ibrox, wearing the same colours and singing the same songs. So it will still be Rangers to me"
Without wanting to appear facetious Red, if it is still the same Rangers then surely any investigation into EBTs and Dual Contracts should not have been "put on hold" by the SPL?
Naturally fans of Rangers will argue that nothing has changed and that liquidation is merely a fresh start, but if that's the case then why are the SFA and the SPL shilly shallying around the issue, why does there have to be a vote to allow Rangers into the SPL/SFL if they are already members?
Depending on whose opinion you hear "The Rangers" are a new club and therefore cannot be punished for the actions of the Old Club, OR they are the same club and could possibly be expelled from the SFA.
If they are a New Club then they should not be held to account for Rangers' (alleged) crimes, if they are the same club then they will have to accept any punishments that they are hit with.



