The clouds have parted...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Everyone's entitled to their own perspective on this but I was talking to a season ticket holder about two months ago and he said " Go ahead,liquidate us but as far I'm concerned it will still be Rangers. We'll be playing at Ibrox, wearing the same colours and singing the same songs. So it will still be Rangers to me"

Without wanting to appear facetious Red, if it is still the same Rangers then surely any investigation into EBTs and Dual Contracts should not have been "put on hold" by the SPL?

Naturally fans of Rangers will argue that nothing has changed and that liquidation is merely a fresh start, but if that's the case then why are the SFA and the SPL shilly shallying around the issue, why does there have to be a vote to allow Rangers into the SPL/SFL if they are already members?

Depending on whose opinion you hear "The Rangers" are a new club and therefore cannot be punished for the actions of the Old Club, OR they are the same club and could possibly be expelled from the SFA.

If they are a New Club then they should not be held to account for Rangers' (alleged) crimes, if they are the same club then they will have to accept any punishments that they are hit with.
 
Only in the eyes of ex-huns and one Kilmarnock Chairman

43-0

Without wanting to appear facetious Red, if it is still the same Rangers then surely any investigation into EBTs and Dual Contracts should not have been "put on hold" by the SPL?

Naturally fans of Rangers will argue that nothing has changed and that liquidation is merely a fresh start, but if that's the case then why are the SFA and the SPL shilly shallying around the issue, why does there have to be a vote to allow Rangers into the SPL/SFL if they are already members?

Depending on whose opinion you hear "The Rangers" are a new club and therefore cannot be punished for the actions of the Old Club, OR they are the same club and could possibly be expelled from the SFA.

If they are a New Club then they should not be held to account for Rangers' (alleged) crimes, if they are the same club then they will have to accept any punishments that they are hit with.

Obsessed much?

How many hours a week do actually devote to rangers?

Embarrassment.
 
chapper:3007551 said:
Only in the eyes of ex-huns and one Kilmarnock Chairman

43-0

54 - 43

Or

54+0 - 43

Either way, you're still behind.

Not got anything to say about the topic? Made a **** of yourself again have you? You're getting as bad as harry

What team has 54 titles?

I know one who had 53.5

They died and won't be getting any more

What have I been missing? SKY confirming they won't walk away

They might renegotiate

Take Rangers (RIP) share

Everyone else will manage fine without it

It's a shame though....I wanted to rip you every day for being the SPL Beggars

Oh well

Dignity MK II awaits
 
What team has 54 titles?

I know one who had 53.5

They died and won't be getting any more

What have I been missing? SKY confirming they won't walk away

They might renegotiate

Take Rangers (RIP) share

Everyone else will manage fine without it

It's a shame though....I wanted to rip you every day for being the SPL Beggars

Oh well

Dignity MK II awaits

Stop obsessing Timmy <grr>
 
DevAdvocate:3008077 said:
What team has 54 titles?

I know one who had 53.5

They died and won't be getting any more

What have I been missing? SKY confirming they won't walk away

They might renegotiate

Take Rangers (RIP) share

Everyone else will manage fine without it

It's a shame though....I wanted to rip you every day for being the SPL Beggars

Oh well

Dignity MK II awaits

Stop obsessing Timmy <grr>

Obsession was the antidote to my paranoia
 
<laugh>

You are the single easiest person on 606 to wind up.

No answer then? No I thought not. Inconvenient questions will be ignored as usual.

Haha, in your wet dreams pecker, you think that's wound up? I know you don't, your just out of ideas/banter. Reply to a post without and caps, rants or !!!!!!!!'s=wound up? Sheeeeeeeeet!...

If you say so it must be true, just hop into bed with chapper, you are two peas in a pod.
Haha again, look at you fuds, over half a dozen of you licking eachothers hoops at every opportunity, regardless of the patter quality
And he hath emptied his bowels over the thrice cursed former huns
the only thing you've emptied is your sacks, prematurely, as discussed earlier.
What team has 54 titles?

I know one who had 53.5

They died and won't be getting any more

What have I been missing? SKY confirming they won't walk away

They might renegotiate

Take Rangers (RIP) share

Everyone else will manage fine without it

It's a shame though....I wanted to rip you every day for being the SPL Beggars

Oh well

Dignity MK II awaits

53.5?

You know, for the intellectuals you claim to be, you don't have a grasp of what certain terms and words mean.

Stop obsessing Timmy <grr>

As said above regarding hoop licking...
 
chapper:3008831 said:
<laugh>

You are the single easiest person on 606 to wind up.

No answer then? No I thought not. Inconvenient questions will be ignored as usual.

Haha, in your wet dreams pecker, you think that's wound up? I know you don't, your just out of ideas/banter. Reply to a post without and caps, rants or !!!!!!!!'s=wound up? Sheeeeeeeeet!...

If you say so it must be true, just hop into bed with chapper, you are two peas in a pod.
Haha again, look at you fuds, over half a dozen of you licking eachothers hoops at every opportunity, regardless of the patter quality
And he hath emptied his bowels over the thrice cursed former huns
the only thing you've emptied is your sacks, prematurely, as discussed earlier.
What team has 54 titles?

I know one who had 53.5

They died and won't be getting any more

What have I been missing? SKY confirming they won't walk away

They might renegotiate

Take Rangers (RIP) share

Everyone else will manage fine without it

It's a shame though....I wanted to rip you every day for being the SPL Beggars

Oh well

Dignity MK II awaits

53.5?

You know, for the intellectuals you claim to be, you don't have a grasp of what certain terms and words mean.

Stop obsessing Timmy <grr>

As said above regarding hoop licking...

Ive never claimed to be an intellectual, but even I know that to share something means you get less than 100% of it

Looks like you've been found guilty at face value on the dual contracts

53.5
52.5
51.5......
 
Ive never claimed to be an intellectual, but even I know that to share something means you get less than 100% of it

Looks like you've been found guilty at face value on the dual contracts

53.5
52.5
51.5......

What's been shared?

Guilty at face value? Talking in riddles again? IF they're found guilty the titles won't be removed.
Calm down Chaps ffs.

Who's not calm? Idiot.
 
On my reckoning Celtic are going for 12 in a row next season after The Rangers are stripped of their last 5 titles .
 
chapper:3009025 said:
Ive never claimed to be an intellectual, but even I know that to share something means you get less than 100% of it

Looks like you've been found guilty at face value on the dual contracts

53.5
52.5
51.5......

What's been shared?

Guilty at face value? Talking in riddles again? IF they're found guilty the titles won't be removed.
Calm down Chaps ffs.

Who's not calm? Idiot.

Do you need a Rangers History

Your first league title was SHARED with Dumbarton

And its in the rules

If you play an ineligible player in a match it will be recorded as a 3-0 loss....for each game played...

How many games will that be?



You're welcome