Without wanting to appear facetious Red, if it is still the same Rangers then surely any investigation into EBTs and Dual Contracts should not have been "put on hold" by the SPL? Naturally fans of Rangers will argue that nothing has changed and that liquidation is merely a fresh start, but if that's the case then why are the SFA and the SPL shilly shallying around the issue, why does there have to be a vote to allow Rangers into the SPL/SFL if they are already members? Depending on whose opinion you hear "The Rangers" are a new club and therefore cannot be punished for the actions of the Old Club, OR they are the same club and could possibly be expelled from the SFA. If they are a New Club then they should not be held to account for Rangers' (alleged) crimes, if they are the same club then they will have to accept any punishments that they are hit with.
54 - 43 Or 54+0 - 43 Either way, you're still behind. Not got anything to say about the topic? Made a **** of yourself again have you? You're getting as bad as harry
You are the single easiest person on 606 to wind up. No answer then? No I thought not. Inconvenient questions will be ignored as usual.
What team has 54 titles? I know one who had 53.5 They died and won't be getting any more What have I been missing? SKY confirming they won't walk away They might renegotiate Take Rangers (RIP) share Everyone else will manage fine without it It's a shame though....I wanted to rip you every day for being the SPL Beggars Oh well Dignity MK II awaits
Haha, in your wet dreams pecker, you think that's wound up? I know you don't, your just out of ideas/banter. Reply to a post without and caps, rants or !!!!!!!!'s=wound up? Sheeeeeeeeet!... Haha again, look at you fuds, over half a dozen of you licking eachothers hoops at every opportunity, regardless of the patter quality the only thing you've emptied is your sacks, prematurely, as discussed earlier. 53.5? You know, for the intellectuals you claim to be, you don't have a grasp of what certain terms and words mean. As said above regarding hoop licking...
Ive never claimed to be an intellectual, but even I know that to share something means you get less than 100% of it Looks like you've been found guilty at face value on the dual contracts 53.5 52.5 51.5......
What's been shared? Guilty at face value? Talking in riddles again? IF they're found guilty the titles won't be removed. Who's not calm? Idiot.
On my reckoning Celtic are going for 12 in a row next season after The Rangers are stripped of their last 5 titles .
Do you need a Rangers History Your first league title was SHARED with Dumbarton And its in the rules If you play an ineligible player in a match it will be recorded as a 3-0 loss....for each game played... How many games will that be? You're welcome
