There's something in the PL rules that precludes anyone who has done anything that would be considered a crime in the UK.
I'm no expert in law but I'd imagine chopping someone's head off falls into that category ...
... and it's enshrined in their constitution.
No denying that there are moral grounds for objecting to this takeover.
But I have a nagging feeling that much of the local outrage might be because it's our 'Friends to the North' who will be the beneficiaries.
Had this been a takeover of, say, Southampton would we have seen the same level of outrage?
Had it been us that were to be the target of the deal would we see a mass desertion of Fans?
I think not to both![]()
I seem to remember there was quite a lot of consternation (both locally and nationally) when we appointed Di Canio because of his right wing leanings. I think there would be a lot more discontent here if we were faced with a Saudi takeover.No denying that there are moral grounds for objecting to this takeover.
But I have a nagging feeling that much of the local outrage might be because it's our 'Friends to the North' who will be the beneficiaries.
Had this been a takeover of, say, Southampton would we have seen the same level of outrage?
Had it been us that were to be the target of the deal would we see a mass desertion of Fans?
I think not to both![]()
No denying that there are moral grounds for objecting to this takeover.
But I have a nagging feeling that much of the local outrage might be because it's our 'Friends to the North' who will be the beneficiaries.
Had this been a takeover of, say, Southampton would we have seen the same level of outrage?
Had it been us that were to be the target of the deal would we see a mass desertion of Fans?
I think not to both![]()
There's something in the PL rules that precludes anyone who has done anything that would be considered a crime in the UK.
I'm no expert in law but I'd imagine chopping someone's head off falls into that category ...
... and it's enshrined in their constitution.
No denying that there are moral grounds for objecting to this takeover.
But I have a nagging feeling that much of the local outrage might be because it's our 'Friends to the North' who will be the beneficiaries.
Had this been a takeover of, say, Southampton would we have seen the same level of outrage?
Had it been us that were to be the target of the deal would we see a mass desertion of Fans?
I think not to both![]()
No denying that there are moral grounds for objecting to this takeover.
But I have a nagging feeling that much of the local outrage might be because it's our 'Friends to the North' who will be the beneficiaries.
Had this been a takeover of, say, Southampton would we have seen the same level of outrage?
Had it been us that were to be the target of the deal would we see a mass desertion of Fans?
I think not to both![]()
I don’t think the government of Qatar sanctioned the murder and dismemberment of fellow humans in their embassy. There may be plenty of bad guys around, but surely we should draw the line at evil.
Whilst I agree with what you’re saying, there is a difference. I have 2 brothers who have worked out there for many years and both have nothing good to say about the place or the people. However they knew what to expect and always went back for another contract as the money was good. It was their choice to go there and were always aware that something could happen to them. However you do not expect to be tortured, murdered and dismembered for visiting am embassy to have some paperwork signed.When you watch the next World Cup in Qatar, take a look at the new Stadia.
These were all built by migrant workers and the death toll, according to press reports, is said to have been horrendous.
Many died working on the sites but many from disease, contracted in the appalling accommodation provided by the authorities. Forced Labour is still going on according to Amnesty International.
Is there a difference?
They all ended up 100% dead.
An 'Investigative' Reporter makes a nuisance of him/herself and gets murdered.
It happens quite a lot, all over the World.
Lyra McKee was the latest in a long and honourable line in Ireland last year.
It's a risk that goes with the job.
And YES they have my total sympathy and respect and appreciation.
But so does a labourer in Qatar.
Of course not but when the likes of Amnesty International are stepping in to protest it shows there are grounds to condemn it whether you support Sunderland or not.
It seems more to me that everyone else is criticising it and we're just joining in.
True but Man City got off pretty lightly, the levels of approbation were less and they were in the process of buying the league and representing England in Europe (https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ter-city-amnesty-international-football-leaks)
The only but that gripes at all is that there are some journalists (I can link if people want but i'll need to dig them out) who were morally ambivalent about the prospect of Man Utd being taken over by a Saudi Arabian investment fund (and posted articles about possible spending power only) but are now seemingly appalled that they could be about to buy out NUFC. It's hard not to take that personally!!
Overall I think we'd all agree we jst don't want these people involved in owning football at all. Sportswashing is certainly a real thing as far as I'm concerned and a number of Russian, Chinese and Middle East people have indulged in it and will continue to do so. The people who are meant to be investing in us have also got stakes in F1 and boxing (i think anyway!) and the government haven't been asked about that. They should have been.
For what? Has there been a purge of skunks?

I don’t think it will be a long road once a tide turns its usually fairly rapid.I think it will go ahead, the authorities in both countries are corrupt imo and money talks. The long term future is less certain, football is going downhill, and this is just one more step on a long road.
I think it will go ahead, the authorities in both countries are corrupt imo and money talks. The long term future is less certain, football is going downhill, and this is just one more step on a long road.
No denying that there are moral grounds for objecting to this takeover.
But I have a nagging feeling that much of the local outrage might be because it's our 'Friends to the North' who will be the beneficiaries.
Had this been a takeover of, say, Southampton would we have seen the same level of outrage?
Had it been us that were to be the target of the deal would we see a mass desertion of Fans?
I think not to both![]()