The Brendan Rodgers / Replacement thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Do you want new manager

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 51.9%
  • No

    Votes: 13 48.1%

  • Total voters
    27
Status
Not open for further replies.
And you would not have?

you don't deny i said enjoy it while it lasts? nor that i said just trust in SAS not "b-rod" and his victor moses, aspas and alberto bench.


That's not the point and you know it, I would have been delighted, but I am still giving Brod the chance even though he failed to get those 3 points, you are not.

Ergo I am not fickle :bandit:
 
Getting Simeone would be on the same level as signing Mario Balotelli!

simeone is a special guy for atletico in terms of belief and inspiration but i don't knwo if he can replaciate it elsewhere. he has been spectacular though.... but also very very nasty.

its the nasty side that makes me say.... eh no thanks but again i reckon he will in the end inevitably fall back and be ridiculed unfairly or ge tout of atletico before it goes tits up and get a huge job elsewhere

Klopp's only crime is to have stayed one season too long.

Mourinho did the same at real.

and frankly.... rodgers has done nothing to be compared to any of them but has bought mario balotelli which none of you can every deny is a total utter **** up.
 
and frankly.... rodgers has done nothing to be compared to any of them but has bought mario balotelli which none of you can every deny is a total utter **** up.

Considering Rodgers stated the the press there was no chance of him buying Balotelli, why do you think it was him and not the committee?
 
simeone is a special guy for atletico in terms of belief and inspiration but i don't knwo if he can replaciate it elsewhere. he has been spectacular though.... but also very very nasty.

its the nasty side that makes me say.... eh no thanks but again i reckon he will in the end inevitably fall back and be ridiculed unfairly or ge tout of atletico before it goes tits up and get a huge job elsewhere

Klopp's only crime is to have stayed one season too long.

Mourinho did the same at real.

and frankly.... rodgers has done nothing to be compared to any of them but has bought mario balotelli which none of you can every deny is a total utter **** up.

committees fault :bandit:
 
simply this....

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/25/mario-balotelli-16m-liverpool-milan

a calculated risk

next:

its well known "b-rod" has a veto on all players arriving. He did not veto this which makes it AT WORST a blessing of his arrival

Next

He picked him...... in all first 9 league games until he got injured.



do you need to to get astro to post a pic of rodgers sucking baloltellis balls in the usa to get him to sign?


That was after he was told by the committee he had no choice as it was the 11th hour.
You don't air your dirty laundry in public, he didn't come out and complain, he got on with it and I commend him dor that
 
simply this....

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/25/mario-balotelli-16m-liverpool-milan

a calculated risk

next:

its well known "b-rod" has a veto on all players arriving. He did not veto this which makes it AT WORST a blessing of his arrival

Next

He picked him...... in all first 9 league games until he got injured.



do you need to to get astro to post a pic of rodgers sucking baloltellis balls in the usa to get him to sign?


Your words; "no other manager signed Balotelli".

Pretty sure Mancini signed him for Man City. Not sure who signed him for Milan but obviously someone did :)
 
I just don't buy it cos Brod has left out Balo so much, if he was his pick, he would have played him far more, definitely
 
That was after he was told by the committee he had no choice as it was the 11th hour.
You don't air your dirty laundry in public

no only when you lose in FA cup and ou cry to the media i suppose.

you cannot deny he picked the lump and palyed hi mmore than lambert or borini. he never gave borini a go far one game and yet he picked the guy from the off.

not his signing... utter balls.
 
simply this....

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/25/mario-balotelli-16m-liverpool-milan

a calculated risk

next:

its well known "b-rod" has a veto on all players arriving. He did not veto this which makes it AT WORST a blessing of his arrival

Next

He picked him...... in all first 9 league games until he got injured.



do you need to to get astro to post a pic of rodgers sucking baloltellis balls in the usa to get him to sign?

So the committee says "take Balotelli, or no one" and he's supposed to say "no one" then (after the **** previously when he was screwed by Carroll being sold with no one else coming in)
 
rodgers doesn't sit in a set of stocks getting flayed by a gimp masked ayre while the committe sits...... MAYBE....

no rodgers is part of committee so they all deserve axing. ALL

Brod wanted Neymadge but the committee gave him just the madge :bandit:
 
no only when you lose in FA cup and ou cry to the media i suppose.

you cannot deny he picked the lump and palyed hi mmore than lambert or borini. he never gave borini a go far one game and yet he picked the guy from the off.

not his signing... utter balls.


it's all imo MITO includng you, speculation.

I have reasons for my opinion, you just hate Rodgers :bandit:
[HASHTAG]#entrenched[/HASHTAG]
 
I just don't buy it cos Brod has left out Balo so much, if he was his pick, he would have played him far more, definitely

If you've not guessed, I've been stringing MITO along for a few comments now <laugh>

I actually agree with his comment regarding the committee. Brod as the final say on all transfers so whether Mario was his pick or not, he said yes.
 
I just don't buy it cos Brod has left out Balo so much, if he was his pick, he would have played him far more, definitely

look at the history of balotellis games for LFC. He picked the ****er at the start prior to injury then he came back rodgers gave up on him and then balotelli got the hump and had a virus on and off for several months...

You can see he got picked at the start very clearly.
 
Your words; "no other manager signed Balotelli".

Pretty sure Mancini signed him for Man City. Not sure who signed him for Milan but obviously someone did :)

He's had 5 senior clubs and plays for his country, so at least 6 managers have selected him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
Status
Not open for further replies.