The Brendan Rodgers / Replacement thread

That's not the point and you know it, I would have been delighted, but I am still giving Brod the chance even though he failed to get those 3 points, you are not.

Ergo I am not fickle

 

Personally after last season, the thought of Simeone's dour style depresses me.

Enjoying the title only happens at the end of the season, enjoying the football lasts all season

 

simeone is a special guy for atletico in terms of belief and inspiration but i don't knwo if he can replaciate it elsewhere. he has been spectacular though.... but also very very nasty.

its the nasty side that makes me say.... eh no thanks but again i reckon he will in the end inevitably fall back and be ridiculed unfairly or ge tout of atletico before it goes tits up and get a huge job elsewhere

Klopp's only crime is to have stayed one season too long.

Mourinho did the same at real.

and frankly.... rodgers has done nothing to be compared to any of them but has bought mario balotelli which none of you can every deny is a total utter **** up.

 

Considering Rodgers stated the the press there was no chance of him buying Balotelli, why do you think it was him and not the committee?

 

committees fault

 

He'll be fine if we play 2 up top.

 

simply this....

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/25/mario-balotelli-16m-liverpool-milan

a calculated risk

next:

its well known "b-rod" has a veto on all players arriving. He did not veto this which makes it AT WORST a blessing of his arrival

Next

He picked him...... in all first 9 league games until he got injured.



do you need to to get astro to post a pic of rodgers sucking baloltellis balls in the usa to get him to sign?

 

I got shot down more than once for even suggesting that very thing. He laughed at the suggestion when asked, literally.

 

That was after he was told by the committee he had no choice as it was the 11th hour.
You don't air your dirty laundry in public, he didn't come out and complain, he got on with it and I commend him dor that

 

Your words; "no other manager signed Balotelli".

Pretty sure Mancini signed him for Man City. Not sure who signed him for Milan but obviously someone did

 

rodgers doesn't sit in a set of stocks getting flayed by a gimp masked ayre while the committe sits...... MAYBE....

no rodgers is part of committee so they all deserve axing. ALL

 

I just don't buy it cos Brod has left out Balo so much, if he was his pick, he would have played him far more, definitely

 

no only when you lose in FA cup and ou cry to the media i suppose.

you cannot deny he picked the lump and palyed hi mmore than lambert or borini. he never gave borini a go far one game and yet he picked the guy from the off.

not his signing... utter balls.

 

So the committee says "take Balotelli, or no one" and he's supposed to say "no one" then (after the **** previously when he was screwed by Carroll being sold with no one else coming in)

 

He said that because it's part of the game, not to say he had to buy Mario Balotelli anyway.

 

Brod wanted Neymadge but the committee gave him just the madge

 

it's all imo MITO includng you, speculation.

I have reasons for my opinion, you just hate Rodgers
#entrenched

 

If you've not guessed, I've been stringing MITO along for a few comments now

I actually agree with his comment regarding the committee. Brod as the final say on all transfers so whether Mario was his pick or not, he said yes.

 

look at the history of balotellis games for LFC. He picked the ****er at the start prior to injury then he came back rodgers gave up on him and then balotelli got the hump and had a virus on and off for several months...

You can see he got picked at the start very clearly.

 

He's had 5 senior clubs and plays for his country, so at least 6 managers have selected him