The Breakfast Debate

ristac said:
The director hadn't yet been appointed and Radz was about to activate the 12 month extension? I don't know, just throwing ideas out there, it's common knowledge I never over rated Monk, I'm not defending him, if there was one big weakness it was his signings were very hit and miss and he is definitely a coach that would leave a player on the sidelines if his face didn't fit.
Click to expand...
I'm not having a go at you, btw. I'm just really curious why he effectively trashed his reputation with the Leeds fans when it could have easily been avoided if he had given an honourable reason - such as not working with a DoF. But thinking about it, don't they have a committee system at Swansea that is effectively a collective DoF? Hope one of our Swans chums is reading this to clarify.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ristac
w.c.dukenfieldesq said:
I must say I have thought about this. All the blokes I used to drink with have snuffed it 606 is just about the only time I get for "men talk"I think all the posters seem like decent lads including cheshirewhite.
Click to expand...
Well I for one would encourage you. Are you local these days?
 
Whitejock said:
Friends, eh? Which friends might this be? And what evidence have you got. Oh, and a picture of a handshake with a Daily Mail 'terrorist sympathiser' doesn't count as evidence, btw. Plenty of similar pictures with tories shaking hands with McGuinness et al. Oh, go on then, I'll give you an example to mull over. I'm sure the Daily Mail would never consider publishing it, but if it did, it would be hugely believable along the lines of "IRA terrorist tried to kidnap PM by dragging her into a waiting car by the hand".

You must log in or register to see images


On a similar note, did he vote to support the murderous bombing of Iraq that Blair invoked? I suspect not, unlike every tory MP who DID vote for the illegal murder. But why let facts get in the way of a bit of sensationalist smearing, eh? Guess the brainwashing worked well on you. You will, no doubt, suffer for this in the future.

Now if you want evidence of barefaced lying, have a read at this. Even a dyed-in-the-wool tory will chuckle at how Osborne got caught out publicly. Could this be the real reason he resigned?

http://www.independent.co.uk/studen...were-a-tax-on-learning-and-very-a7035226.html
Click to expand...

You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: FORZA LEEDS, Farsleyexile and lifecheshirewhite
lifecheshirewhite said:
Would you shake hands and be friends with people who bomb women and kids ? Would you refuse to say they were wrong ?
He said its wrong for our soldiers to shoot terrorists with guns trying to kill them.He's scum
Click to expand...

You mean like Theresa May and that scum bag (now dead) McGuiness?
Sometimes politics mean the wrong thing to do morally has to be done.
 
lifecheshirewhite said:
Does who was involved have any relevance <doh> neither was Corbyn
Click to expand...
Oh, so you're saying that it's ok for Maggie May to shake hands with them, but not ok for Corbyn to? The tories really have moulded you well, haven't they? And should you not in fact be congratulating Corbyn for his part in keeping dialogue open, which in turn led to the peace process, or would you rather have continued with the tory shoot-to-kill process. I think you are so brainwashed that I already know the answer. You lot must have been turning cartwheels when Blair decided to be a war criminal. Right down the tories' alley, that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chippy / Glory
Whitejock said:
Oh, so you're saying that it's ok for Maggie May to shake hands with them, but not ok for Corbyn to? The tories really have moulded you well, haven't they? And should you not in fact be congratulating Corbyn for his part in keeping dialogue open, which in turn led to the peace process, or would you rather have continued with the tory shoot-to-kill process. I think you are so brainwashed that I already know the answer. You lot must have been turning cartwheels when Blair decided to be a war criminal. Right down the tories' alley, that.
Click to expand...
Take your blinkers off,look at TCs post he was one of the terrorist supporters not in talks with them <doh>
 
Whitejock said:
Friends, eh? Which friends might this be? And what evidence have you got. Oh, and a picture of a handshake with a Daily Mail 'terrorist sympathiser' doesn't count as evidence, btw. Plenty of similar pictures with tories shaking hands with McGuinness et al. Oh, go on then, I'll give you an example to mull over. I'm sure the Daily Mail would never consider publishing it, but if it did, it would be hugely believable along the lines of "IRA terrorist tried to kidnap PM by dragging her into a waiting car by the hand".

You must log in or register to see images


On a similar note, did he vote to support the murderous bombing of Iraq that Blair invoked? I suspect not, unlike every tory MP who DID vote for the illegal murder. But why let facts get in the way of a bit of sensationalist smearing, eh? Guess the brainwashing worked well on you. You will, no doubt, suffer for this in the future.

Now if you want evidence of barefaced lying, have a read at this. Even a dyed-in-the-wool tory will chuckle at how Osborne got caught out publicly. Could this be the real reason he resigned?

http://www.independent.co.uk/studen...were-a-tax-on-learning-and-very-a7035226.html
Click to expand...


I should have read back!
[HASHTAG]#greatminds[/HASHTAG]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whitejock
lifecheshirewhite said:
Take your blinkers off,look at TCs post he was one of the terrorist supporters not in talks with them <doh>
Click to expand...
Supporter? What exactly is a supporter. Someone who wishes to bring a terrorist group to the negotiating table? I supported the peace process too. Does that make me a terrorist? In fact, is everyone who supported it a terrorist? Would you rather people were still shooting at each other to this day? Don't you realise that getting polar opposites to the negotiating table is more difficult that the negotiation process itself?
 
Whitejock said:
Supporter? What exactly is a supporter. Someone who wishes to bring a terrorist group to the negotiating table? I supported the peace process too. Does that make me a terrorist? In fact, is everyone who supported it a terrorist? Would you rather people were still shooting at each other to this day? Don't you realise that getting polar opposites to the negotiating table is more difficult that the negotiation process itself?
Click to expand...

You are talking to a one dimensional thinker.
Everything is black and white and grey doesn't exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whitejock
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back