Yes, though I'm not sure what you mean by 'directors premiums', as that isn't actually a thing.
I've no idea what a directors premium is either, but I'm going to start paying myself one if I can !
Yes, though I'm not sure what you mean by 'directors premiums', as that isn't actually a thing.
I presume the reference is meant to be "Directors fees for services rendered'.Yes, though I'm not sure what you mean by 'directors premiums', as that isn't actually a thing.
I presume the reference is meant to be "Directors fees for services rendered'.
I've no idea what a directors premium is either, but I'm going to start paying myself one if I can !
I don't know , I haven't been reviewing their financial statements. It's hard to imagine there wouldn't be any, in addition to the repayment of P + interest on the loan.I'm not sure there's been any directors fees, has there?
As I said, non accounting person OLM but if they are not drawing salary (supposedly) can;t they draw premiums or such..?Yes, though I'm not sure what you mean by 'directors premiums', as that isn't actually a thing.
As I said, non accounting person OLM but if they are not drawing salary (supposedly) can;t they draw premiums or such..?
As I said, non accounting person OLM but if they are not drawing salary (supposedly) can;t they draw premiums or such..?
The award themselves a shareholders dividend. Tax is payable on this money, but not NIC, a saving of 12%. Again, it is commonplace not some Allam wheeze.
So not counting that the value of the club has devalued as we drop down the leagues, have the Allams done anything wrong ( meaning illegal or dodgy) with the way they have financed the club ?They haven't taken a dividend out of City either (only out of Allamhouse).
Grant (me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change(Allams) , courage to change the things I can (formation FFS) , and wisdom to know the difference) McCant,
New and Biggerer Plan
You must log in or register to see images
Previously, If plan A does not work, plan B was to make Plan A work betterer,
Now unveiling Plan C...
Make plan B even bettererer...
So not counting that the value of the club has devalued as we drop down the leagues, have the Allams done anything wrong ( meaning illegal or dodgy) with the way they have financed the club ?
We might not agree with their methods but where do they stand against previous owners like Chapman/Blakey, Harold Needler, Christopher Needler and the Fish regime, David Lloyd, The Sheffield Mafia and the Bartlett/Duffen days ?
So not counting that the value of the club has devalued as we drop down the leagues, have the Allams done anything wrong ( meaning illegal or dodgy) with the way they have financed the club ?
We might not agree with their methods but where do they stand against previous owners like Chapman/Blakey, Harold Needler, Christopher Needler and the Fish regime, David Lloyd, The Sheffield Mafia and the Bartlett/Duffen days ?
24,399 was the highest home attendance around Christmas.Explain this one then. 1970/71. The coming of Terry Neil, 34,000 for the pre season game Watney Cup match v Man Utd. Over 20,000 for the first home game rising to 30,000 plus for league games around the Christmas period. 40.000 plus for the FA Cup game in March v Stoke. By the end of the season we were down below 10,000. This under a chairman who backed the club with his own money and is still idolised today by those who remember him, namely Harold Needler. I remember those days well because I was there. Our home crowd could double in the same week if we had a good result and halve again if we suffered a defeat.
It was cheap to get in, well under £1, we still had the famous five forward line and an international centre half.
Yet home crowds halved in one season and never really recovered for a generation and more.
I think the crowds dropped off because we stopped winning and the dream of promotion to the old First Division evaporated.
Conclusion, we are a fickle bunch.
What a surprise, you missed/ignored the point because it doesn't fit with your view and opinion
I think the asset stripping debate is a rather pointless one, it's just a matter of semantics. There's no question that they've been systematically selling off the club's playing assets and investing only a tiny percentage of the revenue raised on their replacements.
...and part 2 ...You must log in or register to see media
Paul Sewell nails it. He’d be a great owner if he had the brass.