The ballot...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
AlRawdah said:
The club’s email addresses have always been hulltigers.com, right back to the start of, and even before, Adam Pearson’s tenure.

Which is not to say that the main point, that the addresses could be changed in a day if they wanted to with the old addresses redirected, isn’t a sound one. It’s a excellent point.
Click to expand...

Personally, the email addresses don't bother me at the moment. It's the basic match day stuff that needs to be changed, as promised, as the priority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlRawdah and Doug
The Trust wrote to the club earlier this week, reminding them that they'd ignored our previous communication expressing concerns over the ballots and also ignored The FSF and Supporters Direct who wrote to them on the same subject. We got a reply from a very cross Ms Beercock, or perhaps a Ms Beercock being told what to write by a cross Ehab, complaining that we bombard them with messages, accused us of being misleading and a lack of accuracy (with no explanation or examples even when queried) and said they'd respond to us in 'a few weeks'.

I'm tempted to say it's unbelievable but it really isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbetiger, Howden Tigress and Newland Tiger
originallambrettaman said:
I'm disappointed with Vicky's handling of things so far, rather than actually trying to deal with the issues, she just seems to have fallen into the same trap as her predecessors and concentrated on defending Ehab's ****wittery.
Click to expand...

Certtainly seems that way now. It was different for the first few weeks. Presumably Ehab put a stop to anyone thinking of behaving reasonably towards supporters.
 
PLT said:
The Trust wrote to the club earlier this week, reminding them that they'd ignored our previous communication expressing concerns over the ballots and also ignored The FSF and Supporters Direct who wrote to them on the same subject. We got a reply from a very cross Ms Beercock, or perhaps a Ms Beercock being told what to write by a cross Ehab, complaining that we bombard them with messages, accused us of being misleading and a lack of accuracy (with no explanation or examples even when queried) and said they'd respond to us in 'a few weeks'.

I'm tempted to say it's unbelievable but it really isn't.
Click to expand...
Good grief. Business as usual then. What a set of chumps running our club.
 
PLT said:
The Trust wrote to the club earlier this week, reminding them that they'd ignored our previous communication expressing concerns over the ballots and also ignored The FSF and Supporters Direct who wrote to them on the same subject. We got a reply from a very cross Ms Beercock, or perhaps a Ms Beercock being told what to write by a cross Ehab, complaining that we bombard them with messages, accused us of being misleading and a lack of accuracy (with no explanation or examples even when queried) and said they'd respond to us in 'a few weeks'.

I'm tempted to say it's unbelievable but it really isn't.
Click to expand...

I wonder why that was the phrase / timeframe she choose to use?! :emoticon-0112-wonde
 
originallambrettaman said:
I'm disappointed with Vicky's handling of things so far, rather than actually trying to deal with the issues, she just seems to have fallen into the same trap as her predecessors and concentrated on defending Ehab's ****wittery.
Click to expand...
I expected this to be honest (I don’t know her mind you)
She took the job knowing what they’re like
Many of us on many occasions have said that regardless of your job title at the club no one has autonomy to make any significant decisions at all...Ehab has to approve pretty much everything
 
PLT said:
The Trust wrote to the club earlier this week, reminding them that they'd ignored our previous communication expressing concerns over the ballots and also ignored The FSF and Supporters Direct who wrote to them on the same subject. We got a reply from a very cross Ms Beercock, or perhaps a Ms Beercock being told what to write by a cross Ehab, complaining that we bombard them with messages, accused us of being misleading and a lack of accuracy (with no explanation or examples even when queried) and said they'd respond to us in 'a few weeks'.

I'm tempted to say it's unbelievable but it really isn't.
Click to expand...
Have you published this and their responses?
Should get hold of buckingham with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash and look_back_in_amber
The proposed introduction of ID cards by the club is a draconian invasion of civil liberties that are proven to lower attendances and have been fought against in the past. If you oppose their introduction, join us on a demo outside west stand main entrance at 2.15pm on 28th April

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber, Kempton and SW3 Chelsea Tiger
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back