The ballot...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
juleskaren said:
"We will be empowering stewards to do regular on the spot checks on the stadium grounds including: before entry, at the gates, in the stadium, whilst you are seated, and as you are leaving- in short, anywhere at any time in the stadium. You will need to be able to prove who you are, and if you can’t the membership card will be confiscated.
  1. If you are found to be abusing the revised rules i.e. using someone else’s card or using a card that is not the correct age group for you, the Club will confiscate your card on the spot and you will be ejected from the stadium".
Only just started reading this thread and I am angry. The way this is worded is totally over the top and dictatorial. If I purchase a seat for the season and for some reason I cannot get to a game why the hell shouldn't a family member/friend of my choice go in my place (not charging money for this). As usual all he is doing is setting he fans against each other again. Have not looked at the pricing yet but from reading Twitter today I gather in East Stand it will be more or less our old price which is a lot higher than at the moment, not a little higher - a lot.
Click to expand...
Sounds like nazi occupation of Europe
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Ex Aberdeen now E.R., juleskaren and Edelman
Barchullona said:
Yet Norwich sell out with a smaller population. Must be well off or keen on their football. Their concessions aren't that fantastic either.
Wednesday cheapest is £455 on the Kop, but their best stand tickets are slightly more than ours. Their pay on the day prices are high, which is why their crowds don't vary much.

The devil is in the detail. Our headline lowest price is good for a very limited group in specific areas. For most it is expensive.
Click to expand...
My God you're Boring.:emoticon-0113-sleep:emoticon-0113-sleep:emoticon-0113-sleep
 
Piss up, brewery, Ehab, springs to mind. I'm at a loss understanding re. the intention of the "new based on old" model. If it is pitching supporters against each other, and/or driving support away, success, well thought through. I voted for the principle of concessions, prepared to pay more. Our family tickets under the latest offering would mean paying £828 pa more! Utter madness and bollocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: askewshair, Pat E O'Dors, Ron Burguvdy and 3 others
I will continue to abstain from voting.

I will not endorse this poll, the trust and all protest groups should be telling people to boycott this vote as what Ehab has done is childish and acted like the man we all know him to be.

And some people where even starting to believe the Allams had changed we would win a battle. Ehab will always make sure he wins, I hope people learn from this and never trust the Allams again.

All this has done is reinforce the fact I am doing the right thing by boycotting. Time to up the protests or join me in my boycott.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug and Rigsby
We really do want to hear from you on this one, so to encourage you to vote and have your say.

Well, Mr Ehab.

Pin back you lug oles ....... ARE YOU SO SHAMELESS THAT YOU CARRY ON LIKE THIS?

YOU ARE / HAVE SYMPTOMATICALLY DESTROYING (DESTROYED) THE CLUB THAT IS/HAS BEEN PRETTY MUCH MY WHOLE LIFE, NOT SOME ****ING CASH MACHINE FOR YOU.

YOU PETTY VINDICTIVE TWAT, WILL YOU **** OFF FROM MY CLUB?

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackAndAmberGambler
I'll be honest, I haven't bothered to read the details released today, as it was, as it always is, too ****ing obvious that it would be another Allam "**** you supporters" episode. I'm not reading anything in the last few pages to make me think I should in fact read it. The sooner the Allams **** off the better.
 
So people are prepared to go along with this charade in order to establish the principal of concessions. It’s not even that we all pay more so the concessions pay less. What it means is we all pay exorbitantly more so the concessions pay less. That in itself is not a problem for me. What is a problem is that even though I don’t mind paying more, there are conditions attached to it. Having taken my money, and having got photo ID etc, I am not allowed to give my pass to another adult so he/she can go. The net revenue to the club is not affected. They are not being deprived of revenue as the person I give my pass to wouldn’t go otherwise. Our family has two adult passes but there are four of us who go. I go every match and the other goes to whoever can go. This is why I would like us to inform Ehab to shove his proposal and not bother with voting. It’s patently obvious that he has proposed and worded it in such a way that he is banking on most people not wanting to pay double, and will be delighted to announce that he gave us a chance and those that voted turned it down. Divide and rule. Or if he’s not happy will decide to offer another vote. Who knows? Everyone has their own vested interests and their own principals. The wording on that proposal document is so dictatorial yet we are supposed to be grateful for its content!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackAndAmberGambler, askewshair, Springtigress and 3 others
Clovis Iscariot said:
So people are prepared to go along with this charade in order to establish the principal of concessions. It’s not even that we all pay more so the concessions pay less. What it means is we all pay exorbitantly more so the concessions pay less. That in itself is not a problem for me. What is a problem is that even though I don’t mind paying more, there are conditions attached to it. Having taken my money, and having got photo ID etc, I am not allowed to give my pass to another adult so he/she can go. The net revenue to the club is not affected. They are not being deprived of revenue as the person I give my pass to wouldn’t go otherwise. Our family has two adult passes but there are four of us who go. I go every match and the other goes to whoever can go. This is why I would like us to inform Ehab to shove his proposal and not bother with voting. It’s patently obvious that he has proposed and worded it in such a way that he is banking on most people not wanting to pay double, and will be delighted to announce that he gave us a chance and those that voted turned it down. Divide and rule. Or if he’s not happy will decide to offer another vote. Who knows? Everyone has their own vested interests and their own principals. The wording on that proposal document is so dictatorial yet we are supposed to be grateful for its content!
Click to expand...

The last season I had a pass I paid over £500. That season because of being in hospital or having paramedics out on a Friday or Saturday I missed 9 games. I gave my pass to one of my lads who was out of work to go with the other one or a big City fan who was also out of work. Now you couldn't do that under the new proposals. Wonderful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FILEYseadog
If I wanted to join in with Ehabs game, I would vote against it. The principle of concessions is irrelevant, what really matters is that it's affordable for everyone to attend. Save for a small minority who might save a teeny tiny bit, this is far ****ing from it. Those prices were ridiculous then and they're even more ridiculous now.

But I won't play Ehabs games, because I'm not an idiot. There are apparently 25000 of them for him to toy with though, so he won't go bored.
 
Its getting ****ing stupid do.they say 18 percent voted i know geoff bielby said few weeks ago from a club source not many people ad done the vote
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back