Care to elaborate?
As Koeman said...we have had no serious offers for our players.Read on another site the offer was £10m ....WTF!
Liverpool right now arent all that, their squad is in need of a revamp, I think the manager is out of his depth tactically and whoever is in charge of transfers has ****ed up massively. But they still have the history, the money and the size to be an attractive proposition to most players in the world, including Saints players. As I said before if the option is there for Clyne to join an Arsenal/Chelsea/City/United and he chose Liverpool then, yes he is making a mistake, but I can't blame him for wanting to join them if it is a straight choice between us and them.
Sure all these things are because of their history/money but are still big factors for any player.
That's fair enough, I can't disagree with any of that. But the Saints board, the manager, and most of the players are all signed up for a project to ultimately bring Champions League football to Southampton. Obviously to do that we need the best possible squad, with competition for every place to push players to their limits. What I simply fail to understand is why people like Nathaniel Clyne, and Morgan Schneiderlin as well for that matter, don't want to be a part of that. They are both young enough to give us another couple of years to see if the progress we have made every year since 2009 continues, by which time their value will have increased enormously.According to some on here it seems we have a better manager and better players than Liverpool, despite them finishing above us in the table whilst having European football for the first half of the season to contend with. "What is the point in our players joining Spurs/Liverpool?" I have read on here many times, well ignoring the fact that they pay more money and have better history, they are more recognised globally, have better teams/squads, more chance of European football, bigger fanbases and can attract better players. Sure all these things are because of their history/money but are still big factors for any player.
Are Saints on an upward curve? Yes, most definitely. Are Liverpool on a downward curve? Yes. Have the curves got to a point where the clubs are on a level footing? No, close and much closer than even 2 years ago, but still no. There is also no evidence that Saints can continue the upward curve, I and everyone on here obviously hopes they do, but none of us know whether or not the record breaking season we have just had will stay as a record for many years or we will break it again next year. Another person who doesn’t know this is Nathaniel Clyne. One thing I do know is that if you look back through history the teams who spend the most on players/wages finish the highest in the table, so having money is essential and makes Liverpool’s current state look easier to overcome than Saints breaking the mould and finishing above them regularly.
This is all coming across as very pro Liverpool, which I suppose it is, but believe me when I say they are my least favourite PL club. I hate their deluded fans and their sense of being some sort of “special” club. I am just trying to look at it objectively.
So the only difference is money and history after all.
That's fair enough, I can't disagree with any of that. But the Saints board, the manager, and most of the players are all signed up for a project to ultimately bring Champions League football to Southampton. Obviously to do that we need the best possible squad, with competition for every place to push players to their limits. What I simply fail to understand is why people like Nathaniel Clyne, and Morgan Schneiderlin as well for that matter, don't want to be a part of that. They are both young enough to give us another couple of years to see if the progress we have made every year since 2009 continues, by which time their value will have increased enormously.
Which means they get better personal terms, so it's win-win for them, as long as the club does well.Not if they run down their contracts!!!
Young upstarts!Historically we are the Senior team, formed in 1885, Liverpool came along on 1892.
10 mil for Clyne? **** off Brendon
That's fair enough, I can't disagree with any of that. But the Saints board, the manager, and most of the players are all signed up for a project to ultimately bring Champions League football to Southampton. Obviously to do that we need the best possible squad, with competition for every place to push players to their limits. What I simply fail to understand is why people like Nathaniel Clyne, and Morgan Schneiderlin as well for that matter, don't want to be a part of that. They are both young enough to give us another couple of years to see if the progress we have made every year since 2009 continues, by which time their value will have increased enormously.
Yes, I remember Oxo saying that. I imagine his father and his agent had a lot to do with what he said, and maybe they had a point, but to me in a strange way it shows a lack of ambition!I see your point, but the other thing to consider is the offer is on the table for Clyne (and presumably Morgan) now. Say they did give it 2 more years, imagine if their form dropped off a cliff, they got seriously injured or the top teams after them went and signed alternatives and they weren’t wanted/needed anymore? I remember reading an article with Chamberlain when he was talking about joining Arsenal and he said something along the lines of “if you don’t take the opportunity now it may never come again” and this was a 17 year old who the majority were saying should stay and continue his development playing regular first team football.