Takeover

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Should the club remains in the hands of the Allams(no takeover emerges) and we are promoted at the end of this season I presume the purse strings would only be loosened slightly and Season pass prices would yet again rise .
 
At the end of the day the Allams aren't stupid. A full kc at a cheaper ticket would likely mean more income to them and a better performance from the team (though we can't do much better at home than we are already) which would mean more money for them. Not sure why the hike in the first place as it essentially hurts themselves more from a financial point of view.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
At the end of the day the Allams aren't stupid. A full kc at a cheaper ticket would likely mean more income to them and a better performance from the team (though we can't do much better at home than we are already) which would mean more money for them. Not sure why the hike in the first place as it essentially hurts themselves more from a financial point of view.
Click to expand...

Because they're stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: balkan tiger
The best run club that buyers have seen? **** off with that bullshit. Who does he think he's kidding?!!
 
they
SydneyTiger14 said:
At the end of the day the Allams aren't stupid. A full kc at a cheaper ticket would likely mean more income to them and a better performance from the team (though we can't do much better at home than we are already) which would mean more money for them. Not sure why the hike in the first place as it essentially hurts themselves more from a financial point of view.
Click to expand...
the allams stated that if they didnt get the name change,then they would run the club as a business.i think putting the prices up was a dummy spitting exercise.but its put their outlay at risk and therefore probably affected the interest rate at which they borrow the money and lend to the club (at a profit of course).this is just my view and may not be correct.just the way i see it.
 
wetherspoons tiger said:
they

the allams stated that if they didnt get the name change,then they would run the club as a business.i think putting the prices up was a dummy spitting exercise.but its put their outlay at risk and therefore probably affected the interest rate at which they borrow the money and lend to the club (at a profit of course).this is just my view and may not be correct.just the way i see it.
Click to expand...
If they were running it as a business they would be maximising revenue, which would be at a lower price that would see the stadium full each week.
 
Happy Tiger said:
He's right.

Regardless of the name change etc they will be leaving us with a decent legacy and for all the outrage, the club is well run from a business perspective.

It's Not doing too badly from a football one too.
Click to expand...

when the Allams took over - we were in the Championship, crowds of over 20k and debts of £30 million - now were in the championship, crowds of 5000 less and debts of £77 million - decent legacy, more like a **** up
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
charon-the-ferryman said:
when the Allams took over - we were in the Championship, crowds of over 20k and debts of £30 million - now were in the championship, crowds of 5000 less and debts of £77 million - decent legacy, more like a **** up
Click to expand...
The debt is to the owners not to third parties, infinitely better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back