Match Day Thread Sunderland AFC v Burnley FC – Saturday 22nd October 2022 - KO 15:00

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Your prediction:


  • Total voters
    53
  • Poll closed .
That was when we played 2 up top, we are clearly set up to play 1 striker, therefore you need 1 replacement.

So we buy a third striker,l that when everyone is fit doesn't even make the bench
Squad rotation, injuries, a different approach to a game
Somebody on here looked at all the squads in our division, and ours is the only squad with only two strikers, does that not tell you something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf and Sunderpitt
Squad rotation, injuries, a different approach to a game
Somebody on here looked at all the squads in our division, and ours is the only squad with only two strikers, does that not tell you something?
We are trying something different?

Here's a thought, if we had held on second half, would strikers even have been mentioned tonight?
 
Do you think a game only lasts 45 mins, to keep up the pressing game we were doing for the full 90mins turned out to be impossible
To play at any level with no striker at any level of football is very ,very difficult
It impinges the entire teams play, from defence to attack

If you can win the first half 2-0, you can win the second half. If we only managed to achieve that half time score by superhuman pressing then there'll inevitably be some tired legs later, which our quality bench can alleviate, but that doesn't explain coming out asleep after the break.
 
We didn't though and we've gone from a really positive start when we had strikers to 4th bottom of the form table since they both got injured.
So we buy a third and fourth striker then?

What if they get injured?

I don't see many posts asking for a third striker when we win. It's an easy stick to beat them with.
 
So we buy a third and fourth striker then?

What if they get injured?

I don't see many posts asking for a third striker when we win. It's an easy stick to beat them with.

At least a 3rd, yes. If you've got 4 strikers injured at the same time you're very unlucky. If you've got 2 injured at the same time and don't have a backup that's bad planning, in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
To avoid the shambles that we have had to endure for the last few months perhaps? Its obvious that teams know we have nothing to hit upfront. Centre half’s are having a day off playing against us at the moment.

Shambles is a bit harsh, I think we are on track still for a good season. The nature of the defeat was hard to take to-day, equally as hard as the Blackburn one tbh. Both Burnley and Blackburn look nailed on top six, and we are not so far behind. I think any criticism should be limited until we see if lessons have been learned and what steps are taken in January. A good window and who knows, this squad could go all the way to eclipse last season , anything is possible imo. OaU.
 
Shambles is a bit harsh, I think we are on track still for a good season. The nature of the defeat was hard to take to-day, equally as hard as the Blackburn one tbh. Both Burnley and Blackburn look nailed on top six, and we are not so far behind. I think any criticism should be limited until we see if lessons have been learned and what steps are taken in January. A good window and who knows, this squad could go all the way to eclipse last season , anything is possible imo. OaU.
Not having a 3rd striker is probably the one mistake we made in the transfer window so maybe shambles was the wrong word, instead of signing as many midfielders we should have signed another striker. IF we had signed that extra striker we would be comfortably top 3 in my opinion with some top players to return.
 
No, because its very different getting a left midfielder or a centre back, for example, to fill in at left back compared to getting a midfielder to play as a striker. It's a very specialist position and you should have enough resilience in your team to cover for two strikers getting injured at the same time i.e you need at least 3 strikers.
We only had 2 last season, one of which missed quite a few games injured yet we still gained p
We didn't though and we've gone from a really positive start when we had strikers to 4th bottom of the form table since they both got injured.
We scored 2 goals at home, having no strikers on the pitch had nothing to do with us losing today
 
Not having a third striker is, as you say, LBW, probably the ONE mistake that we made, and we're suffering 'cos of it, but our circumstances have been unusual, which is so unlucky, but we've got some great newbies who most of us are excited about and we could be positive looking at what we've got (and what we've got when injured players return) :emoticon-0148-yes:

It's not all 'doom & gloom' like some people want us to believe :emoticon-0145-shake
 
It’s not an agenda, it’s a bleedingly obvious issue. There’s a reason why every other club has at least 3 centre forwards. Sure they bring goals but we miss the height when defending set pieces too.
We all know what the issue is and have all known for weeks if not months - but it's still raised every time we go behind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: malagamackem