That was Stewart and his agents fault, it was never taken from the table after his injury just the club wouldn't allow him to sign it, there maybe an offer now that if it was signed would be the same offer with clauses in to do with the injury or prove your fitness and the original offer is there.From what the ITK’s seem to be saying, the contract that was on the table before the second injury was a good one. It should’ve really been sorted last summer thats the main problem I have
I'm just guessing at the second part as the changes but the first part about the club putting it on hold is right