Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Either way they can’t replace him, and Liverpool have nicked the best replacement.

They will go for Sesko or Vlahovic if it happens, both very good but neither close to Isak.

The bit that does make sense about all of this is that Ekitike and Isak are very similar. It never seemed likely to me that the plan was for them to play together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
They may get a charge from the fa, that will not bother them
They will challenge the fa and they will win, money talks
They are quite simply very quickly going to be in charge of world football
They already have fifa in their back pockets
This unfortunately.
 
They may get a charge from the fa, that will not bother them
They will challenge the fa and they will win, money talks
They are quite simply very quickly going to be in charge of world football
They already have fifa in their back pockets

i think the current 'top leagues' will go, with the prize money and worldwide coverage that they get from such as the european competitions and now this club world cup that looks likely to grow...the leagues will mean nowt, the super league that was talked about will simply have more money thrown into it with those against it getting a big cut, unfortunately greed always wins and the saudis know people will always want more.

what was that one earlier. 1bn per year...mental.
 
I don’t give a **** if there’s a super league.

Short term may be damaging, but I’d watch a PL with no Manchester and North London clubs.

Theres plenty of massive clubs outside the PL and the product would remain far better than a round robin of the same games.
The super league would give everyone a chance to reset and they go off and play their closed shop while teams like us, Leeds, sheff utd, Everton, palace etc play in an ultra competitive top division
 
I don’t give a **** if there’s a super league.

Short term may be damaging, but I’d watch a PL with no Manchester and North London clubs.

Theres plenty of massive clubs outside the PL and the product would remain far better than a round robin of the same games.
I half want it, with the ‘top 6’ and state owned clubs would all **** off
 
The super league would give everyone a chance to reset and they go off and play their closed shop while teams like us, Leeds, sheff utd, Everton, palace etc play in an ultra competitive top division

Aye. And it would be brilliant.

Facts are we are at a stage of accepting defeat to City etc it’s ****e anyway.

Do we really lose out if we can compete with great clubs like Leeds, Everton, West Ham etc clubs that haven’t been moulded and are plastic as ****?

I don’t think so. Everyone be bored of a super league after a season then those clubs are ****ed.

A club like us could thrive,
 
Aye. And it would be brilliant.

Facts are we are at a stage of accepting defeat to City etc it’s ****e anyway.

Do we really lose out if we can compete with great clubs like Leeds, Everton, West Ham etc clubs that haven’t been moulded and are plastic as ****?

I don’t think so. Everyone be bored of a super league after a season then those clubs are ****ed.

A club like us could thrive,
100% agree mate. Let the big 6 go and then the efl can reboot football. Our pyramid system is / was the envy of the world, distribute tv money fairly, ban state ownership for a start.

Tv companies and sponsors would pay decent but not daft money to show it and people would watch.

Look at the championship next season, there's probably 8 or 9 plus teams in with a shout of promotion
 
Status
Not open for further replies.