Think he’d be fine for us given the level. The big attraction for me is that versatility though. Could work for us in multiple positions. Definitely a better bet than Angelino imo.I don’t rate him at LB
Think he’d be fine for us given the level. The big attraction for me is that versatility though. Could work for us in multiple positions. Definitely a better bet than Angelino imo.I don’t rate him at LB
More than fine. Believe he’d have loads of options though, especially abroadThink he’d be fine for us given the level. The big attraction for me is that versatility though. Could work for us in multiple positions. Definitely a better bet than Angelino imo.
Not for me mate but can understand your pointThink he’d be fine for us given the level. The big attraction for me is that versatility though. Could work for us in multiple positions. Definitely a better bet than Angelino imo.
Think he’d be fine for us given the level. The big attraction for me is that versatility though. Could work for us in multiple positions. Definitely a better bet than Angelino imo.
They both can’t defend very well.Agreed. Can play DM as well.
Similar flaws to Angelino, lack of pace, ****e positionally.
They both can’t defend very well.
id only want Angelino if we’re playing a 5 back
Think we could stand him inverting so long as the front three stay spread right out. I’m imagining much of our football will be balls over the top for the attackers so having him coming inside and pinging passes may actually work nicely. Besides, the other part is the idea that I’d still very much want to see Cirkin get a shot to see what he can do, so other routes into the team would be useful.Not for me mate but can understand your point
he’s just not the LB for our system, he’s better inverting and that’s why I like him more when he can play in a possession dominant side like arsenal or city so he can slot into the holding role in a 325
I think it means wow. Hes a good keeperfor those of us that don’t speak youth… what does he mean?
The big players will nit be available till later in the window when the “ big 6” have done their businessWouldn’t say holes as such, but certainly key positions that we need to fill - and some where the talent gap is more pronounced. My only niggle here is that the strongest links we’ve seen thus far don’t address those bigger talent gap areas. Just nervous excitement though. Seems like we’re taking care of ‘less critical’ spots first. As I said earlier that’s either very bad (as we’re confused about our needs) or very good (as we’re going a lot further than we expected). Defo voting for the latter![]()
Hope we get this one over the line. He looks quality.You must log in or register to see mediaDefinitely a upgrade in that aspect on patto
Bournemouth is a strange link as they just bought their new lbYou must log in or register to see media
considering they want to sell him by June 30th good luck with that
Elliott will be eyed by many many clubs from home and abroad, i dont hold out any hope for him coming here.Would definitely forgo the keeper and Lauriente if the money could go towards Elliott mind. Now he’d be a transformative signing!
No chance. It’s a dream land signing. Why would he come here?Elliott will be eyed by many many clubs from home and abroad, i dont hold out any hope for him coming here.
RLB likes HjeldeI can see Moore, Blondy, Poveda, Aleksic, Jones, Browne, Poveda, Seelt, Hjelde all leaving either sold or out on loan from that.
Then I’d focus on upgrading what we can in the starting XI with those Lauriente, Bulka type players. Then whoever stays in the XI, maybe get someone younger who costs less but has high potential to be their depth.
The ones who fell out of the XI (IMO would be O9, Rigg, Mundle, Roberts, Patterson, Isidor, Cirkin (Maybe) would become very solid options form the bench to complete and rotate