Summer Transfer Window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Hes playing like Wood at the moment
He is. I’ve watched him a lot and he’s better when breaking from deep when the players are moving.

In a possession based team I am not so sure he will find it as easy. They play slow and his strengths are pace and power.
 
Who the ****s this
LOL, you answered the question well... Welcome to the forum and everything...

Its funny that a couple of lads on an Internet forum think they are somehow so much better at doing transfer buisness then fully trained scouts/negotiaters etc..

Paqueta would be my ideal signing, the bloke is quality. But there is no concrete evidence that he is going for 30mil bar a few rumours. Has anyone actally got solid evidence this is his price tag beyond a rumour in the mirror? (In January apparantly it was 50 mil, which is a risk for player who flopped at Milan).. So just asking again, who do you propose is actually is better then Maddison for 40Mil, who is proven Premier league quality?... In my book Maddison is better then Richarlison who just went for more then that to Tottenham m
 
LOL, you answered the question well... Welcome to the forum and everything...

Its funny that a couple of lads on an Internet forum think they are somehow so much better at doing transfer buisness then fully trained scouts/negotiaters etc..

Paqueta would be my ideal signing, the bloke is quality. But there is no concrete evidence that he is going for 30mil bar a few rumours. Has anyone actuslly got solid evidence this is his price tag beyond a rumour in the mirror? So just asking again, how actually is better then Maddison for 40Mil, who is proven Premier league quality?... In my book Maddison is better then Richarlison who just went for more then that to Tottenham m

We won't get Maddison for 40m though, probably more like 60m

Welcome to the forum by the way
 
LOL, you answered the question well... Welcome to the forum and everything...

Its funny that a couple of lads on an Internet forum think they are somehow so much better at doing transfer buisness then fully trained scouts/negotiaters etc..

THIS is from the book of CHAOS.

Paqueta would be my ideal signing, the bloke is quality. But there is no concrete evidence that he is going for 30mil bar a few rumours. Has anyone actally got solid evidence this is his price tag beyond a rumour in the mirror? (In January apparantly it was 50 mil, which is a risk for player who flopped at Milan).. So just asking again, how actually is better then Maddison for 40Mil, who is proven Premier league quality?... In my book Maddison is better then Richarlison who just went for more then that to Tottenham m

This isn't comparing players like for like, other than the obvious diving trait.
 
LOL, you answered the question well... Welcome to the forum and everything...

Its funny that a couple of lads on an Internet forum think they are somehow so much better at doing transfer buisness then fully trained scouts/negotiaters etc..

Paqueta would be my ideal signing, the bloke is quality. But there is no concrete evidence that he is going for 30mil bar a few rumours. Has anyone actally got solid evidence this is his price tag beyond a rumour in the mirror? (In January apparantly it was 50 mil, which is a risk for player who flopped at Milan).. So just asking again, who do you propose is actually is better then Maddison for 40Mil, who is proven Premier league quality?... In my book Maddison is better then Richarlison who just went for more then that to Tottenham m
T

And welcome to the group in the Samaritan’s backyard.

You’re also forgetting the fact that those couple of lads are also experts in how to run a multi million football business.
 
LOL, you answered the question well... Welcome to the forum and everything...

Its funny that a couple of lads on an Internet forum think they are somehow so much better at doing transfer buisness then fully trained scouts/negotiaters etc..

Paqueta would be my ideal signing, the bloke is quality. But there is no concrete evidence that he is going for 30mil bar a few rumours. Has anyone actally got solid evidence this is his price tag beyond a rumour in the mirror? (In January apparantly it was 50 mil, which is a risk for player who flopped at Milan).. So just asking again, who do you propose is actually is better then Maddison for 40Mil, who is proven Premier league quality?... In my book Maddison is better then Richarlison who just went for more then that to Tottenham m

Lol indeed.

By saying "you" in your post, you made it very clear you're not a fan of this football club.

So I ask again, who are you, who do you support?

Lay bare your bias before you comment like.

I think Panqueta is a better player than Maddison and value for money, I think that you're adding on a "proven premier league" quantity which I generally think is a load of bollocks.

The original point of my post is that we will never sign Maddison for 40m and in the price range we can get better, ala, better value for money.

Aka Pagueta for 30m is better than Maddison for 60m+