Summer transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Roker Mackem over the road thinks they mean business.

This will be their second signing of this transfer window, a right back on a free and a loan.

I’m disappointed he hasn’t joined but it’s not the end of the world
If Broadhead and Nyambe are indicative then I think they are being quite ambitious in terms of quality if not yet numbers. Would have been happy with either here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Southern A
I genuinely moved on from Broadhead about a week ago once it started to sound like the Borini saga. Would have been nice to have him here but whatever. Want players here that are not only good enough but 100 percent committed.

Aye I thought it wasn’t going to happen once we signed Simms and handed him the number 9 shirt. Broadhead is a cracking player and good luck to the lad if he signs for Wigan but we may have struck gold anyway with Simms.
 
Aye I thought it wasn’t going to happen once we signed Simms and handed him the number 9 shirt. Broadhead is a cracking player and good luck to the lad if he signs for Wigan but we may have struck gold anyway with Simms.

this mate. Simms looks quality. One game in, but seems to be the business. Re Broadhead, it just seems to be dragging on. I feel Wigan have good old Geography on there side. Only reason I can see him going there.
 
Said it a few days ago when I was disappointed that we’d only loaned Simms, a loan for Broadhead just makes no sense at all.

You loan players that are unrealistic transfer targets due to cost or potential, or players you want off the wage bill with no interest of being there. Broadhead is neither. He’s worth a few hundred grand at most, what’s the point in wasting a loan and wages on someone who’s not going to improve our starting Xl and is well within our budget?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
He played 21 league games

I mean yeh, my point was purely he played more than the 25 games that people are suggesting he won’t be able to manage for Wigan.

It’s a fantastic loan signing for them and he’d have been a fantastic permanent signing for us. But it couldn’t be worked out. Is what it is.

Im excited about what opportunity it opens up to bring a third striker in. No reason why that third striker wouldn’t be another loan from a club who might be more willing to have that player be an “option” rather than guaranteed starter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
I mean yeh, my point was purely he played more than the 25 games that people are suggesting he won’t be able to manage for Wigan.

It’s a fantastic loan signing for them and he’d have been a fantastic permanent signing for us. But it couldn’t be worked out. Is what it is.

Im excited about what opportunity it opens up to bring a third striker in. No reason why that third striker wouldn’t be another loan from a club who might be more willing to have that player be an “option” rather than guaranteed starter

But he played less than 1300 minutes in the league out of a possible 4140.

It’s not a good loan by any means and I’m glad we’ve pulled out because if we’d loaned him again I would’ve thought we were struggling. The fact we’ve stood our ground is convincing for us moving forward.
 
I told you,s 3 weeks ago it was not happening, we won't take a risk, it's not worth it,
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: young2077
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.

why worry.
They seem y to o he doing ok with their decision making. Have trust in them
 
Could be a rollercoaster of emotions day today on the message boards. Signing in if the medical happened yesterday but Broadhead to Wigan.
 
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.
If they've assessed the risk and don't want to go for it, it doesn't make them a 2nd rate recruitment team, it just makes them more risk adverse than you would like. Time will tell whether this is the right decision but I'm sure thorough consideration was given if it is the case that it was indeed a Sunderland decision.
 
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.

Alvarez is enough to make any organisation risk averse ... or at least make the deal so that it balances any risk.
We don't know any details, it might have been the selling club wanting far too much and nothing to do with the player himself.