In a 46 game league season plus the 3 cups we were involved in… Let’s see if he manages the same this season.Played 27 last season
If Broadhead and Nyambe are indicative then I think they are being quite ambitious in terms of quality if not yet numbers. Would have been happy with either here.Roker Mackem over the road thinks they mean business.
This will be their second signing of this transfer window, a right back on a free and a loan.
I’m disappointed he hasn’t joined but it’s not the end of the world
I genuinely moved on from Broadhead about a week ago once it started to sound like the Borini saga. Would have been nice to have him here but whatever. Want players here that are not only good enough but 100 percent committed.
In a 46 game league season plus the 3 cups we were involved in… Let’s see if he manages the same this season.
If Broadhead and Nyambe are indicative then I think they are being quite ambitious in terms of quality if not yet numbers. Would have been happy with either here.
Aye I thought it wasn’t going to happen once we signed Simms and handed him the number 9 shirt. Broadhead is a cracking player and good luck to the lad if he signs for Wigan but we may have struck gold anyway with Simms.
So, he played in fewer than half of our games last seasonPlayed 27 last season
He played 21 league games
So, he played in fewer than half of our games last season
He played 21 league games
I mean yeh, my point was purely he played more than the 25 games that people are suggesting he won’t be able to manage for Wigan.
It’s a fantastic loan signing for them and he’d have been a fantastic permanent signing for us. But it couldn’t be worked out. Is what it is.
Im excited about what opportunity it opens up to bring a third striker in. No reason why that third striker wouldn’t be another loan from a club who might be more willing to have that player be an “option” rather than guaranteed starter
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.I told you,s 3 weeks ago it was not happening, we won't take a risk, it's not worth it,
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.
If they've assessed the risk and don't want to go for it, it doesn't make them a 2nd rate recruitment team, it just makes them more risk adverse than you would like. Time will tell whether this is the right decision but I'm sure thorough consideration was given if it is the case that it was indeed a Sunderland decision.If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.
If the club think this is a risk then I worry about the people making decisions. Would love to know how they determine risk factors. Not doubting your info mate, but if they really counted Broadhead out based on risk they are some way away from a top level recruitment team, IMO.