You must log in or register to see images
Looks a big lad
You zoomed in on his bulging cock too?
You must log in or register to see images
Looks a big lad
You zoomed in on his bulging cock too?
All strikers want tha famous numbaa nine man, ya divvent understand.It doesn’t mean anything at all.
Broadhead might not necessarily have wanted that number anyway, it depends what’s available when people sign.
Nee body is pushing him off the ball easily.
looking at Twitter hearts fans are absolutely gutted he’s not signed with them another year, to the point of acting like jilted boyfriends.
Good point about defending corners. We looked a bit weak there in pre season I thought. Dan Neil got rolled a couple of times for example, but he was picking up one of the big lads. As much as I like Dan, he isnt going to be remembered for his aerial dominance at set pieces.Adds height and brawn by the looks of him, strikers play a big part in defending corners and we now seem to have filled the squad with big lads as well as young and promising players. It’s a good mixture.
He was poor in his defensive aerial duels according to stats I saw mind.Adds height and brawn by the looks of him, strikers play a big part in defending corners and we now seem to have filled the squad with big lads as well as young and promising players. It’s a good mixture.
AN will know his strengths & weaknesses, he will work on both no doubt.He was poor in his defensive aerial duels according to stats I saw mind.
He was poor in his defensive aerial duels according to stats I saw mind.
I bet your the first name on the invites to Christmas partiesFfs....Couldn't give a tinkers **** about his defensive duels....it's his offensive duels I'm interested in.....please don't come along with something negative about that it in a minute.
Well, it's not his strength and it didn't make great reading.Ffs....Couldn't give a tinkers **** about his defensive duels....it's his offensive duels I'm interested in.....please don't come along with something negative about that it in a minute.
I seen it as a stat. An observation.Well, it's not his strength and it didn't make great reading.
The point about his defensive duels was in response to someone raising it as a benefit of signing him.
Well, it's not his strength and it didn't make great reading.
The point about his defensive duels was in response to someone raising it as a benefit of signing him.
You must log in or register to see images
I seen it as a stat. An observation.
Didn't see you as being negative.
No need for that, palI've apologised to him...and to you too. Sorry.
I didn't mean to come across negative. I think it's a cracking signing.Yes,sorry mate...didn't mean to come over aggressive. Was just thinking what a good signing it was,and all of a sudden,there was negativity about it.
Apologies.
I didn't mean to come across negative. I think it's a cracking signing.
Can you see us playing 2 upfront? I think he'll probably need to wait until Stewart drops out of form.The more I look at it,I think it might be the best move we've made in a while. He is a seriously talented lad at this level....he's just what we need!