Haven’t had the chance to look back did we keep Freeman? ( honest question)
Yep we did Oz, don't know whether it was a genuine offer by another club or just a load of bull made up by Sky, see Clive's take from LFW's.....
I always get nervous when someone who actually knows what he is talking about joins in, as my frankly astounding levels of bullshit are likely to be exposed.
Is pure risk equity essentially a gift?
Absolutely...I think. What's a Deborah instrument? Is it what Marc Bolan used to play in Tyrannosaurus Rex?
Clive's take on the Sky Sports Transfer Window...….Good read and also disturbing at the abuse some so called fans give the club on twatter and face ache...…
Another summer transfer window closes and with QPR down a clutch of senior players and only Toni Leistner incoming the church is restless.
Read the rest here ….https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/queensparkrangers/news/48389/window-pain-–-column
What I'm trying (and failing, obviously) to get across is that, whilst the owners have made massive mistakes, they have paid for it themselves and are trying to make amends. They could have walked away, demanded repayment of their loans (or however much they could get) and left the club in administration, or worse. Loans to equity is not a loophole, it's football philanthropy.
I'm not really offended or anything but I don't know why you keep misunderstanding me and putting words in my mouth. I'm not even talking about the Freeman issue. If he goes he goes, if he stays he stays. I can see that Tony is saying that Freeman won't go. I'm saying it's the tone he's taken with the fan. The Tweet was a direct reply to a fan. So therefore, in that context, he's quite clearly saying he's tired of fans and anyone going on about it.He's not saying he's tired of fans' concern though is he? He's saying he's tired of all the **** about Freeman. He said about a week ago that Freeman wasn't for sale and he is now saying that all offers have been rejected. If Freeman now goes you will be entitled to moan.
I wouldn't be opposed to that. He has a lot to offer still. Obviously, he's not the player he was 5 years ago but he won't be that off the pace and will still be better than some of the other defenders we have on the books.Is Clint a free agent?
I'd have him back in a heartbeat on a pay per play basis - if he was up for it. Throw in a coaching role to sweeten the deal
Even 10 games worth would bring some nous and guidance to the defence
That's where i think we are at right now
I wouldn't be opposed to that. He has a lot to offer still. Obviously, he's not the player he was 5 years ago but he won't be that off the pace and will still be better than some of the other defenders we have on the books.
Yes he is learning at the feet of the footballing philosopher thug.Didn't Clint join the Barton revolution at Fleetwood? He retired from playing at end of last season.
Yes he is learning at the feet of the footballing philosopher thug.
Just read that Fulham have spent over £100m in this window, a season’s PL money spunked away. Wouldn’t it be a shame if they were relegated?
It is a huge gamble if you only last the one season. I would take it of course, and I would have probably made all the mistakes TF did as well, except appointing Redknapp and allowing Barton into the club.That’s the gamble Stanley
The way Fulham play football I can see them finishing in the top ten as could Wolves
Those clubs want to stay
It is a huge gamble if you only last the one season. I would take it of course, and I would have probably made all the mistakes TF did as well, except appointing Redknapp and allowing Barton into the club.
But clubs are going to die with the way this business is run. Not all these teams who spend hundreds of millions can stay in the PL and bank on being instantly promoted back if they drop.