But he may have kicked off had we blocked his move to Leverkusen. Particularly if we turned down 20mill.Not like he’s even in the final year of his contract, or kicking off. Purely just a cash grab from the owners.
Sports republic are clowns man.
But he may have kicked off had we blocked his move to Leverkusen. Particularly if we turned down 20mill.Not like he’s even in the final year of his contract, or kicking off. Purely just a cash grab from the owners.
Sports republic are clowns man.
But he may have kicked off had we blocked his move to Leverkusen. Particularly if we turned down 20mill.
Given we've just agreed a new contract with Smallbone I respectfully disagree with the last bit.Don’t think so. Doesn’t seem the type. But I guess we won’t know as we never try and keep any of our best players anyway
I think I must be. Wow they blended together. Did they both only have one season might that be why. I stand corrected. Thanks for correcting me. He still seemed to only write it as if it was an opinion rather than insight. He might well be right but I also don’t think he had board contacts - and most have changed now anywayThink you might be getting Jacob mixed up with Dan Sheldon? He was the one that wrote about our 60th minute time out etc. I like Jacob - always good on the Total Saints Podcast
I don’t think this is true because aren’t the rules spread out over a three year period? Or is that just the PL? So you can completely fail to comply for one year but then will have to really work to align in the following twoBecause of the financial rules in the Championship, I'm guessing it's more a case of can't rather than won't. Owners are only allowed to cover a relatively small amount of losses, and transfers are generally structured such that we'll be paying for a sizable percentage of last year's transfers this year.
We didn’t particularly comply last year. So there has to be a balanceI don’t think this is true because aren’t the rules spread out over a three year period? Or is that just the PL? So you can completely fail to comply for one year but then will have to really work to align in the following two
That could get us 17 goals. He’s done it once for another club in another system. Which is better than most and also any potential replacement - granted. But nothing is a sure thingI agree if the window ended today it will have been a bad one. But there is a week left and Martin has said all along that there will be departures, but that they'll be replaced.
Got to wait until the end of the window before casting judgement really. If the club really think Fraser is good enough to replace Tella then that is a piss take. Whereas if we go and bring in a top quality replacement it isn't so bad.
Although fwiw i think the tella deal is bad either way. Its pretty tough to find a winger that'll get you 17 goals for less than £20m, so not sire how they expect to replcae him.
If hr doesn’t feature tomorrow then he basically has to play every game to hit 39
I don’t think this is true because aren’t the rules spread out over a three year period? Or is that just the PL? So you can completely fail to comply for one year but then will have to really work to align in the following two
Respectfully disagree. I think he would have been very unhappy if we’d blocked a move that takes him to a club playing in Europe. He might not have actively and outwardly kicked off. But he wouldn’t have had the same enthusiasm and spark. The thing lots on here are saying they like about himDon’t think so. Doesn’t seem the type. But I guess we won’t know as we never try and keep any of our best players anyway
Different leagues don’t count for the premier league. Not sure about the championship. So there are teams that have breached championship rules and got away with it due to promotion - wolves for example. I can only assume it doesn’t work the same the other way aroundWe didn’t particularly comply last year. So there has to be a balance
Given we've just agreed a new contract with Smallbone I respectfully disagree with the last bit.
The logic that the vocally unhappy people are using, which I don’t disagree with, is think on if we had signed or were trying to sign someone with his numbers. We’d all be over the moon. And we already had him. That’s where I think the reaction from some is comingI think people are slightly overestimating Tella here. Sure, he's had one great season with Burnley (but even they didn't think he was worth more than £10m). Yes, on the goalscoring front he's popped in a couple of good ones for us so far this season. But in all honesty, other than the two goals (I know, I know), he hasn't looked all that great to me in those games - a weird reluctance to ever take on his man, and some pretty poor decision making. SAA and Edozie have taken their opponents on far more regularly, as will Sulemana (presuming/hoping he stays).
As I've already said, I would have preferred him not to have gone, but I get it from all sides, and I just don't see it as some kind of great disaster for us, as there's plenty of adequate cover at this level. I might be wrong, of course, but I can't see the doom in this one. Just a bit of a shame, that's all.
Context. We're in the Championship.Smallbone is only one of our better players now as we’ve sold everyone else
No he hasn’t.Tella’s been removed from the players on the website by the way, but not seen an actual official announcement.
Still there in midfieldersTella’s been removed from the players on the website by the way, but not seen an actual official announcement.