This, his all-round game is better.
No way, not yet. He's only 21.
This, his all-round game is better.
No way, not yet. He's only 21.

What has age got to do with it?
What kind of a question is that? It's got to do with experience.
What kind of a question is that? It's got to do with experience.
Age has nothing to do with it. Michael Owen was a world beater at 18, Oxlade-Chamberlain and Bale weren't bad for us at 17. Richardson is decent going forward but defensively nothing special. There's every chance Clyne could be better, no matter what age he is.
Richardson should be in his prime now. If Clyne is as good as him at 21 having represented England at U21 and U19 level that's fine by me.
If he has pace as an added quality too, another reason to bring him in. I think it's a good signing and the guy is better than Richardson, and he was named in the Team of the Year as RB.
It seems we try and collect players from the teams of the year... Dickson was in one I think? Rodriguez...Clyne?
Age has nothing to do with it. Michael Owen was a world beater at 18, Oxlade-Chamberlain and Bale weren't bad for us at 17. Richardson is decent going forward but defensively nothing special. There's every chance Clyne could be better, no matter what age he is.
Lets not hope that clyne follows in his footsteps..
Age has nothing to do with it. Michael Owen was a world beater at 18, Oxlade-Chamberlain and Bale weren't bad for us at 17. Richardson is decent going forward but defensively nothing special. There's every chance Clyne could be better, no matter what age he is.
Players improve with age, especially defenders. How can age possibly have nothing to do with it? How well would a 12 year old do?
Jake✔;3127142 said:If you're good enough, you're old enough. That said, I still feel Richardson is better at this moment in time.
I do like Richardson but I think we are in need of someone like Clyne who, like Schad said, is more of an athlete and can get up and down the pitch and has pace.