Potentially but his first words in his interview was that he’s a striker who can play on the wing.
Summer '24 transfer window
- Thread starter Scout73
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Can't whinge about no striker if we sign every striker in world football
Basis his game on Henry and aubameyang. And fans of previous clubs say his best position is the left half space
You must log in or register to see images
I think if Rusyn had a problem it would be because Isidor spent time playing in Russia despite have the option to leave for free. However, it appears to be national Ukrainian flag day
I really don't think that KS views things like that (those tight definitions). I think the club view is more aligned with us wanting to emulate the best Klopp Liverpool teams. We'd never describe Mane and Sala as wingers in the traditional sense.
Not a chance he actually harnesses negative sentiment towards a person from France for playing sport in a country he doesn't like, too many ridiculous levels of abstraction and fundamentally unjustifiable.
Tbf, it doesn’t really add anything that article, he’s just basically reporting on Mendys quotes, but of a clickbaity headlineYou must log in or register to see media
Going from no strikers to being greedy with them
Wow what a **** show this thread has been to wake up to 
. 60 odd pages. And some true colours being shown.
Anyway we all knew we needed two strikers so I don’t think Mendy or Simic coming in necessarily means Isidor is for left wing. I think Isidor will prove to be Rusyn’s replacement and another striker be Hemir’s. Mundle is likely already Clarkes replacement.
Also it definitely seems to me at least that this Simic deal wasn’t as advanced as we’d hoped. He was clearly here in person but if there’s also a Serbian player doing the rounds then that’s probably the guy who had the medical.
. 60 odd pages. And some true colours being shown. Anyway we all knew we needed two strikers so I don’t think Mendy or Simic coming in necessarily means Isidor is for left wing. I think Isidor will prove to be Rusyn’s replacement and another striker be Hemir’s. Mundle is likely already Clarkes replacement.
Also it definitely seems to me at least that this Simic deal wasn’t as advanced as we’d hoped. He was clearly here in person but if there’s also a Serbian player doing the rounds then that’s probably the guy who had the medical.
Also a little bit disappointed to wake up to no fresh stories on Simic. I fear that one might have got away:
Don’t stress about him
Point D is spot on. There is one poster in particular on here who has said this for about a year (can't remmeber who it is?). We need to let players move on when they have a chnace to go to a higher level, that way we will continue to attract more players who need the opportunity to develop themselves with first team football! If we blocked Clarke moving on others may think **** that!
Instead Clarke will leave with nothing but good things to say about the club that helped him get his career back on track!
As much as it pains me to see them go, it's spot on!
I'm sure it's been said but if we lose Clarke but manage to keep Neil, Ballard and Patto while adding Simic or Mendy maybe even both to the business already done I think we will be stronger. Keep forgetting about Poveda is he not a winger?
I'll still miss Clarke beating several players when in full flow like!
