He barely played but that is the type of midfielder he is.
What, a midfielder that barely plays?
He barely played but that is the type of midfielder he is.
What, a midfielder that barely plays?
Even Norwich?
And that goalkeeper turned out ****...Hahah. Salford beat L**ds on pens.
KLP scored winning penalty for Brentford
https://x.com/logxnlufc/status/1696633288616452368?s=46&t=6yWS38e0UuzPwoO5cckOhAAnd that goalkeeper turned out ****...
And Massive club lost at home to Mansfield on penalties as well

I think you’ll find 53.7% of the posters like stat chat…@mods Can we have a separate stat thread in the same way we started a seperate FFP thread.
This constant stat nonsense is boring as ****kk to the normal casual supporter.
It’s bollocks
The Travis who is a ball-winning midfielder. Some Blackburn fans think Morton is ****e.
At what xG?I think you’ll find 53.7% of the posters like stat chat…
He barely played but that is the type of midfielder he is.
Was actually 53.76 % so you might want to check your rounding.I think you’ll find 53.7% of the posters like stat chat…
Clear proof that you don’t know me…Was actually 53.76 % so you might want to check your rounding.
This stuff does my head in.
People get defensive when you call it video game logic but I don't see what else it can be. Guy who's barely played any games in his career, the stats show he doesn't win the ball back much but you insist that he just factually is a ball-winning midfielder. Categorising of players into simple pigeon holes with absolutely nothing to back it up. Just "he is" a ball winning midfielder, even though he doesn't have any sort of record of winning the ball very much. Factually wins the ball less than Seri, but because Seri's short and can pass he just can't be a ball-winner and Simons can. Really ridiculous stuff.