Transfer Rumours Summer '23 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Seri I'll definitely give you, and the defenders you mention are definitely becoming every bit champ players, along with Ingram, but top end of the pitch and out wide, where's the championship experience and robustness that's needed? Tufan has improved, but do you honestly think we'd get a full season of consistency from him?

Oscar you can argue would do it, but as with tufan, do you really think we'd get a full season out of him based on what we know of him so far? And if he's out injured who else up there is a potentially 15+ goal a season player?

The wide players we have bar longman (who isn't good enough imo) don't have much experience combined and definitely don't strike me as full season players when it comes to consistency and robustness let alone the quality that's needed.

Full backs are about sorted. Wingers we are miles off.
 
Full backs are about sorted. Wingers we are miles off.

Wingers are miles off, the forwards aren’t exactly sorted either as Tetteh’s going and Óscar could still go, could do with another keeper and midfield needs some physicality and aggression. Defence looks sorted for now. A back-four of Christie A. Jones Greaves Vinagre is arguably top 6 and McLoughlin is a solid centre-half at this level too.

I watched Brentford vs Brighton in that pre-season tournament last night and I can see how Rosenior wants us to play like that but we are miles off from replicating it even to a Championship top 6 standard. Brighton controlled possession, played out from the back etc. but their passes had some zip and purpose to them. And the difference between their wingers and ours is night and day. Mitoma and Adingra were direct, pacy and played without fear. The only winger we have who plays in a similar way is Vaughan. Allahyar I think can still come good but his muscle injuries are starting to become a concern and he needs to improve his end product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NewcastleTiger
I think we are ready to challenge the top 6 at the back ( bar a senior keeper to fight with Ingram )

What's your take on reducing senior squad numbers to 23/24?

We're about 26/27 now and we're bringing 3-4 in.

Woods we know can leave and I'd be surprised if we didn't accept decent loan offers for Longman, Fleming, Doc if he's fit, but there's been a suggestion we might listen to offers for Allahyar - and it still sounds like we're willing to field offers for Greaves and Oscar if the price is right.

There's potentially a lot of outs before deadline day.
 
What's your take on reducing senior squad numbers to 23/24?

We're about 26/27 now and we're bringing 3-4 in.

Woods we know can leave and I'd be surprised if we didn't accept decent loan offers for Longman, Fleming, Doc if he's fit, but there's been a suggestion we might listen to offers for Allahyar - and it still sounds like we're willing to field offers for Greaves and Oscar if the price is right.

There's potentially a lot of outs before deadline day.

I wonder if its 23/24 plus youth like Smith/Jarvis who dont have to be registered. Massive benches with 5 subs allowed and the normal champ schedule will stretch the squad but I get why Rosenior wants it as opposed to the supposed 30 we had last year. You're always letting about 10 players down potentially in a squad of 30. Lampard talked about it really well in that podcast he did about the last couple months at chelsea. It's hard to motivate those fringe guys
 
What's your take on reducing senior squad numbers to 23/24?

We're about 26/27 now and we're bringing 3-4 in.

Woods we know can leave and I'd be surprised if we didn't accept decent loan offers for Longman, Fleming, Doc if he's fit, but there's been a suggestion we might listen to offers for Allahyar - and it still sounds like we're willing to field offers for Greaves and Oscar if the price is right.

There's potentially a lot of outs before deadline day.

It doesn't feel like we're at 26/27. We've been struggling to field 2 XIs without using the kids.

It's whether you count the likes of Jarvis, Smith and TLT in that 26/27
 
  • Like
Reactions: HulltoHellandback
What's your take on reducing senior squad numbers to 23/24?

We're about 26/27 now and we're bringing 3-4 in.

Woods we know can leave and I'd be surprised if we didn't accept decent loan offers for Longman, Fleming, Doc if he's fit, but there's been a suggestion we might listen to offers for Allahyar - and it still sounds like we're willing to field offers for Greaves and Oscar if the price is right.

There's potentially a lot of outs before deadline day.

I'm sure doc would have probably gone if injury hadn't hit, longman/woods/Fleming we would happily let leave if there was takers. Ally I'd also personally let move on, I'm just not sure he suits English football

Oscar & graves have a price and if that price is met they will go, if it's the prices I'm hearing then I wouldn't be to upset to see them go and I suspect if the price I'm hearing is true it's the reason they are here still and not due to lack of interest
 
I'm sure doc would have probably gone if injury hadn't hit, longman/woods/Fleming we would happily let leave if there was takers. Ally I'd also personally let move on, I'm just not sure he suits English football

Oscar & graves have a price and if that price is met they will go, if it's the prices I'm hearing then I wouldn't be to upset to see them go and I suspect if the price I'm hearing is true it's the reason they are here still and not due to lack of interest

Standard negotiating that though.

If there's multiple interest then take it to the brink but hopefully with the time left to reinvest.

That's the gamble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2
I think it's been a fairly consistent message that they are absolutely being mindful of it and we can only run at a budget which complies with it.

That's very different to saying they have to reduce the budget to avoid a points deduction and therefore compelled to flog off our assets.

It's turnover plus 13m (ave over 3 years). That's the budget.

If you don't spend up to it then you're not maximising it, but once you're close to it you have to move players out to get new ones in.

Most championship clubs accept this as reality now. I think the reason it's relatively new for us as fans is we went from parachute payments to owner disinvestment and then to L1.

Since the rules have been enforced the way they are now, City haven't been ambitious enough to spend the limit until recently.

I know this has probably been done to death, forgive me but we are hamstrung because two (?] of the last three years were under Allam and their zero investment? So each season, the FFP situation should improve quite dramatically ?
 
I'm sure doc would have probably gone if injury hadn't hit, longman/woods/Fleming we would happily let leave if there was takers. Ally I'd also personally let move on, I'm just not sure he suits English football

Oscar & graves have a price and if that price is met they will go, if it's the prices I'm hearing then I wouldn't be to upset to see them go and I suspect if the price I'm hearing is true it's the reason they are here still and not due to lack of interest

I think Allahyar’s issue is the injuries. Seems really prone to muscle injuries and I’m not sure if it’s how he trains and plays or something else. He arrived on loan to us injured and we had to wait a month for his debut.

It’s a shame really because he’s physically developed early for his age. He’s quick and strong and his pace is his biggest asset but when he makes one of those lung-bursting sprints to beat a player, you’re flipping a coin as to whether he knackers his hamstring. I think he knows this as well because he plays more cautiously than he did before his injury.

He can’t really improve the technical aspects of his game consistently if he doesn’t get an uninterrupted run in the team.

It really is a shame when you see a player who has all the physical attributes to be a good footballer and has potential to develop the technical parts but struggles to stay injury-free.
 
Interesting poking my head out of the doom and gloom bubble of this thread to listen to The Second Tier predictions for the season and the hosts are calling us a dark horse for top 6 because they believe we have the most attacking wing back combination in the league in Vinagre and Christie, so it's not all thunderclouds when we take a step back and consider how we're viewed externally.
 
I know this has probably been done to death, forgive me but we are hamstrung because two (?] of the last three years were under Allam and their zero investment? So each season, the FFP situation should improve quite dramatically ?

Under the last 2 seasons under the Allams you can look up online and see what the profit (loss) was.

There wasn't a lot of profit until they wrote down the Allam house loan as part of the sale agreement.

That doesn't count towards FFP.

The disinvestment also reduced our turnover to that of a league 1 club. No sponsors, pissed off the fans. We are lucky we aren't currently experiencing the same as the 90s in L2 as we would have been if Ehab was still around.
 
Last edited:
If Allahyar and Longman were to leave this summer, we’d need a huge overhaul to our wingers. Sinik isn’t even fit to get 20 minutes in pre-season so that leaves Vaughan and Lokilo as our only first-team wingers. We do need more wingers but I wouldn’t get rid of Allahyar just yet. Let Longman leave if we get someone else in, if anyone would take him.
 
If Allahyar and Longman were to leave this summer, we’d need a huge overhaul to our wingers. Sinik isn’t even fit to get 20 minutes in pre-season so that leaves Vaughan and Lokilo as our only first-team wingers. We do need more wingers but I wouldn’t get rid of Allahyar just yet. Let Longman leave if we get someone else in, if anyone would take him.

Believe Vaughan is a no10 by trade, but he's certainly a option.

If either Oscar or Greaves are sold though, we're going to need another 2 strikers and good quality centre-half and another good left back additionally to the 3/4 we need now.
 
I know this has probably been done to death, forgive me but we are hamstrung because two (?] of the last three years were under Allam and their zero investment? So each season, the FFP situation should improve quite dramatically ?

A little of column A, a little of column B. In the 19/20 season when we were relegated, we made a 2.6m profit thanks to the sale of Bowen, but in 20/21 getting promoted from League One we made an 8.2m loss (arguably that was due to their investment to get us back out). This scaled back to a 6.1m loss last season, meaning over that three year period we made a net loss of 11.7m, well under the 39m allowable limit. Then the 2.6m profit year drops off and whatever craziness happened last season gets added on to the rolling calculation meaning we're sitting at 14.3m + whatever we lost last season. As long as we lost less than 25m (and I'd bloody hope we lost a lot less than that) we're fine for FFP, and then that bigger loss of 8.2m loss drops off for what we can then lose this season, and so on.

Much like Newcastle under Ashley, the Allams profligacy was actually attractive to a new owner as it meant much more scope to invest quickly, it's just a shame a lot of it was wasted on loan fees/wages and Turkish wunderkinds.
 
A little of column A, a little of column B. In the 19/20 season when we were relegated, we made a 2.6m profit thanks to the sale of Bowen, but in 20/21 getting promoted from League One we made an 8.2m loss (arguably that was due to their investment to get us back out). This scaled back to a 6.1m loss last season, meaning over that three year period we made a net loss of 11.7m, well under the 39m allowable limit. Then the 2.6m profit year drops off and whatever craziness happened last season gets added on to the rolling calculation meaning we're sitting at 14.3m + whatever we lost last season. As long as we lost less than 25m (and I'd bloody hope we lost a lot less than that) we're fine for FFP, and then that bigger loss of 8.2m loss drops off for what we can then lose this season, and so on.

Much like Newcastle under Ashley, the Allams profligacy was actually attractive to a new owner as it meant much more scope to invest quickly, it's just a shame a lot of it was wasted on loan fees/wages and Turkish wunderkinds.

Were Vale and M'hand Turkish Wunderkids?