Neither was Ashbee, Marney, Garcia, Hughes.
No it was a top 3 that also won the play-offs…
Neither was Ashbee, Marney, Garcia, Hughes.
Bird and Seri in front of a solid back 4, with Traore at number 10. I’d say that’s got top 6 potential. Who we sign as attacking reinforcements will decide if we can compete or not imo
?Neither was Ashbee, Marney, Garcia, Hughes.
Neither was Ashbee, Marney, Garcia, Hughes.
?
The FACTS / history say otherwise.
I think prime Ashbee in 2008 would get in this current team.
I would argue that midfield was more balanced and solid than our current one. I think prime Ashbee in 2008 would get in this current team.
He may well, but at the time nobody was saying he's a top end championship player and that's the point. People can and routinely do break out of these pigeon holes fans give them. Based on what we've seen already from them, Seri, Slater and Traore being part of a promotion-winning midfield is no less likely than it was for those guys in 2008.
He may well, but at the time nobody was saying he's a top end championship player and that's the point. People can and routinely do break out of these pigeon holes fans give them. Based on what we've seen already from them, Seri, Slater and Traore being part of a promotion-winning midfield is no less likely than it was for those guys in 2008.
Seri = Hughes
Slater = Marney
Traore - Garcia
No 'Ashbee'
That's the problem.
That's exactly the problem
Seri and Bird is the same issue as Seri and Woods or Seri and Slater. It offers little protection for the back 4 against counter-attacks. Boro and Sunderland away tore us a new arsehole because of this as nobody in midfield was willing or capable to win the ball back in the middle third of the pitch or at the very least, make a tactical foul in a less dangerous area.
Our back 4 is quite solid and Ingram and Darlow saved our skins a few times with their great saves but that only tells half the story. We may concede fewer goals since Rosenior came in which is a huge improvement. However, we still concede quite a lot of chances by the opposition. Even against West Brom at home when we won 2-0, West Brom had 21 shots and 6 on target compared to our 8 shots and 2 on target. If West Brom were better at finishing on the day we might've drew or even lost that game.
.
Birds defensive stats are actually better than Bieliks who you seem to be clamouring for. He’s also done that in a side who dominate the ball more than Birmingham so it’s even more impressive. He’s not as physical as a typical defensive midfielder, but as long as he gets stuck in it shouldn’t matter too much
.
Birds defensive stats are actually better than Bieliks who you seem to be clamouring for. He’s also done that in a side who dominate the ball more than Birmingham so it’s even more impressive. He’s not as physical as a typical defensive midfielder, but as long as he gets stuck in it shouldn’t matter too much
Seri = Hughes
Slater = Marney
Traore - Garcia
No 'Ashbee'
That's the problem.
Still?
Christ. "We never replaced Ashbee" is basically a meme at this point. Who was the Ashbee in 2013 I wonder.
Still?
Christ. "We never replaced Ashbee" is basically a meme at this point. Who was the Ashbee in 2013 I wonder.
We need someone like Ashbee in midfield. Most of the other clubs in the league have one; even the ones who play possession-based football like us.
West Brom have Yokuşlu, Luton had Nakamba, Brum had Bielik on loan last season, Stoke had Ben Pearson on loan from Bournemouth, Coventry have Ben Sheaf, Blackburn have Travis, Swansea have Fulton etc. etc.