Why does there have to be a single, simple explanation for our defeat at Plymouth? We were ****. It happens sometimes. It will continue to happen sometimes no matter who we appoint as our future managers. Judging managers, squads or seasons based on a single game is a ridiculous pursuit. In this case, the wider body of evidence shows that we were a good side with some obvious limitations.
I agree that people seek simple narratives and that we were ****e.
But, that was a big game and how a manager gets his team to perform in the big games is, in my opinion, a valid measure of his ability (one of many).
This measure is one that the great managers manage to meet.
If we had taken an early lead at Plymouth, who knows, that could have seriously unsettled WBA.