Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
This is why I think our transfer policy is a bit like a little kid in a sweet shop. Just because we can do a deal for a player doesn’t mean we should. There are other factors to consider.

I think they’ve been sensible this summer tbf. You can see a real long term plan with what they’re trying to do and a move towards being more sustainable. Rushworth is probably the first transfer I’ve really questioned this window. I still have questions over midfield balance etc and obviously the South American gambles could backfire massively. But overall I think its been a strong window
 
I think they’ve been sensible this summer tbf. You can see a real long term plan with what they’re trying to do and a move towards being more sustainable. Rushworth is probably the first transfer I’ve really questioned this window. I still have questions over midfield balance etc and obviously the South American gambles could backfire massively. But overall I think its been a strong window

Burns, Rushworth, Mehlem now (if Meffert comes off), Giles, there's a few signings this window people are questioning. Let's see how it pans out and if we're here in 12 months trying to sell a bunch of them or trying to fill gaps because loanees have done well but not come permanently.
 
If it is Rushworth, then surely Racioppi was from the development budget?

But if not, then I'm inclined to agree.

He's 25, I don't think so.

It isn't a waste if he comes in and is a safe pair of hands who can play the system. Pandur and Racciopi will be fighting it out with him, it keeps them motivated and it keeps us covered in case of injury.

It's also worth noting that both Foster and TLT are out of contract at the end of this season, with Cartwright out of contract in 2026. Pandur and Racciopi are contracted until 2027, which means that at the end of this season, we'd only have the two we have now anyway plus Cartwright.
 
Burns, Rushworth, Mehlem now (if Meffert comes off), Giles, there's a few signings this window people are questioning. Let's see how it pans out and if we're here in 12 months trying to sell a bunch of them or trying to fill gaps because loanees have done well but not come permanently.

Rushworth and Burns are the only 2 loanees without options, so can’t see that being a problem. Haven’t seen many question Mehlem or Meffert both seem astute signings for a relatively low fee. Giles is fair, but I think that’s more to do with overpaying than his quality. Burns a bit of a utility man brought in for cover imo, but will be cheap.
 
Rushworth and Burns are the only 2 loanees without options, so can’t see that being a problem. Haven’t seen many question Mehlem or Meffert both seem astute signings for a relatively low fee. Giles is fair, but I think that’s more to do with overpaying than his quality. Burns a bit of a utility man brought in for cover imo, but will be cheap.

I'm questioning Mehlem because by the end of the week he won't be best XI. Maybe that was always the plan, but just feels weird signing someone of his age to not overly improve the XI. Maybe just a symptom of basically buying an entire squad in one window.
 
Rushworth is probably better than either Pandur or Racioppi but only marginally and him signing is at the detriment to the two keepers we already have. We signed Pandur in January because he was a highly-rated keeper in Eredivisie despite playing for one of the weaker teams. The owner kicked up a fuss because the previous manager didn’t play him. He had an iffy pre-season but he looks a lot better and more assured now. His biggest strengths are his shot-stopping and commanding his box. His distribution isn’t bad either, in my opinion, and he’s improving every game. Racioppi I’ve seen a bit in the Swiss league and Champions League. He’s also a decent shot-stopper with decent distribution. He’s partial to a brain fart and is a bit rash coming off his line but he’s solid.

Pandur and Racioppi competing for the starting spot is healthy competition and ideal. A third keeper coming in on loan as first-choice ruins that dynamic completely. We’re already out of the League Cup so we just let two first-team keepers we’ve signed in the last eight months for significant fees rot on the bench or in the stands? This is why I think our transfer policy is a bit like a little kid in a sweet shop. Just because we can do a deal for a player doesn’t mean we should. There are other factors to consider.

Yeah the good thing is that this is the only transfer so far this window I’ve raised an eyebrow at. It’s an odd one
 
I'm questioning Mehlem because by the end of the week he won't be best XI. Maybe that was always the plan, but just feels weird signing someone of his age to not overly improve the XI. Maybe just a symptom of basically buying an entire squad in one window.

I think Mehlem will be in Walter’s XI
 
I'm questioning Mehlem because by the end of the week he won't be best XI. Maybe that was always the plan, but just feels weird signing someone of his age to not overly improve the XI. Maybe just a symptom of basically buying an entire squad in one window.

Was always going to be the case with the number of players we had to bring in. Even if he doesn’t improve the XI he certainly improves the squad
 
Burns, Rushworth, Mehlem now (if Meffert comes off), Giles, there's a few signings this window people are questioning. Let's see how it pans out and if we're here in 12 months trying to sell a bunch of them or trying to fill gaps because loanees have done well but not come permanently.

Mehlem still makes sense to me as a replacement for Tufan. On paper, Walter plays a 4-3-3 but the left-sided midfielder usually plays as a #10. Was the same at Hamburg with Bénes doing that role. The other advanced midfielder is more box-to-box which is what Slater’s currently doing.

I have my own questions about how we’re going to fit in all our midfielders. If we sign Meffert then we’ve got Simons, Zambrano and Meffert competing for the #6 spot and Burns can play there as well. Slater and Puerta I’m guessing can play as the #8 and Mehlem and Ömür for the #10, or Ömür and Mehlem start together ahead of one of the #6s. We’re signing a couple natural right-wingers too so Ömür would have to play more centrally for him to get minutes.

This summer was a massive rebuild but there’s a fine balance between needing depth and having a bloated squad of unhappy players who all think they should be starting. That’s evident at Chelsea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
So then Omur to the bench?

I could foresee a midfield 3 of any of these combos until one clicks or fitness

- Meffert/Zambrano/Mehlem
- Meffert/Puerta/Mehlem
- Meffert/Omur/Mehlem

I think with his back against the proverbial wall he’s going to rely on players that either pick it up quick or already know it. Meffert and Mehlem have played with him before and he’s apparently had a reputation of sticking with favourites
 
Mehlem still makes sense to me as a replacement for Tufan. On paper, Walter plays a 4-3-3 but the left-sided midfielder usually plays as a #10. Was the same at Hamburg with Bénes doing that role. The other advanced midfielder is more box-to-box which is what Slater’s currently doing.

I have my own questions about how we’re going to fit in all our midfielders. If we sign Meffert then we’ve got Simons, Zambrano and Meffert competing for the #6 spot and Burns can play there as well. Slater and Puerta I’m guessing can play as the #8 and Mehlem and Ömür for the #10, or Ömür and Mehlem start together ahead of one of the #6s. We’re signing a couple natural right-wingers too so Ömür would have to play more centrally for him to get minutes.

This summer was a massive rebuild but there’s a fine balance between needing depth and having a bloated squad of unhappy players who all think they should be starting. That’s evident at Chelsea.

That's I think my concern. When you sign for a club you expect to at least get a chance to start (unless you're a young player like Burstow who would understand you're here longer term). When you're a Mehlem, I can't imagine you'd be thrilled to be told you'll only start the odd game. I also wonder if we let Simons go out on loan again on Deadline Day if everything comes off, as I think it's a waste leaving him on the bench. Can always recall him in Jan if we have injury issues or some of the signings don't pan out.
 
I'm questioning Mehlem because by the end of the week he won't be best XI. Maybe that was always the plan, but just feels weird signing someone of his age to not overly improve the XI. Maybe just a symptom of basically buying an entire squad in one window.

We need squad depth though. One of our weaknesses in the last couple of years has been that when we needed to change a game, we've had to turn to League One standard players from the bench. If we have 11 very good players and another 9 Championship quality players on the bench, that stands us in good stead and provides depth if we pick up injuries, which in this intensive system we more than likely will.
 
We need squad depth though. One of our weaknesses in the last couple of years has been that when we needed to change a game, we've had to turn to League One standard players from the bench. If we have 11 very good players and another 9 Championship quality players on the bench, that stands us in good stead and provides depth if we pick up injuries, which in this intensive system we more than likely will.

Yeah my last sentence kind of acknowledges this, so it's almost a necessary evil, but I just wonder how the players would be feeling. Maybe they're coming in with their eyes open? It just feels like we've gone from desperately scrounging around for signings (Burns, Mehlem) to picking and choosing strong signings (these three strikers we're talking to), and the guys we signed initially might end up hardly being used.
 
Yeah my last sentence kind of acknowledges this, so it's almost a necessary evil, but I just wonder how the players would be feeling. Maybe they're coming in with their eyes open? It just feels like we've gone from desperately scrounging around for signings (Burns, Mehlem) to picking and choosing strong signings (these three strikers we're talking to), and the guys we signed initially might end up hardly being used.

Id need to map it out but I think toast is about right with the numbers. We probably have a squad of about 22 which can compete and then some peripheral players if you don’t include the odd keeper situation. As long as the players have been told they’ll come in to compete for spots I don’t see a large issue. In a 46 game season they’ll get appearances especially come November/December
 
Id need to map it out but I think toast is about right with the numbers. We probably have a squad of about 22 which can compete and then some peripheral players if you don’t include the odd keeper situation. As long as the players have been told they’ll come in to compete for spots I don’t see a large issue. In a 46 game season they’ll get appearances especially come November/December

Yeah as I said, if that's the case then not a huge issue. I am a bit concerned Man City might get pissed off at us about Burns but guess we'll see.
 
Yeah as I said, if that's the case then not a huge issue. I am a bit concerned Man City might get pissed off at us about Burns but guess we'll see.

It's their fault too, they'll have a loan manager and thy should be very well aware we've got Alfie who's a steady and reliable performer who doesn't usually miss games so gametime was always going to be tough with us.

I presume it was a panic/backup signing in case we couldn't get Hughes
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
This is not a "it is ok if we finish 10th window we will all enjoy our beautiful football together" that is horseshit, this has been a window that shouts i want to be in the automatics spot to me it never was a 3 year build it is more like a do or die for TW now, they want the Prem this season.

Some will say we need time to gel, we are a young team, well he has brought players with reputations to the club in one swoop and looks like considerable cost and still more to come a striker to change the dynamics 2 wingers another midfielder and whatever surprise he decides to chuck in on friday deadline if anyone actually thinks they will be happy with a midtable or top 10 finish then you need to give your heads a shake.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
one thing that is remarkable given our turnover since acun arrived, is that Sinik aside who's had a horrid injury record, we don't really have any dead wood in the squad who we're stuck with or can't get rid of, kind of shows that even with the enthusiasm with which we've brought in players from all over that there has at least been a method to the madness