Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I always felt Jones was massively helped out by Greaves

Jones cemented his place before Greaves did. Think we forget Greaves only really came to the fore over the last couple of seasons.

And of course Macca and Jones were the pairing for a lot of the previous-to-last season with Greaves at LB.

He's a solid enough squad option, but if you add both potential in Hughes and McKenna for experience to the current pair we'd look pretty strong in that area on paper at least.
 
You mean the same Alfie Jones that played excellently when Greaves was out at LB?

I always used to think Jones looked a bit suspect at the back, but improved dramatically last season. Coincidentally when paired regularly next to Greaves. Whether that had any bearing I’m not sure but he’s not looked great this preseason
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newland Tiger
Anyone else fed up of hearing about add-ons this summer? No one ever used to know or care about the payment structure of a transfer fee, but suddenly this summer it's everywhere. It really shouldn't be of interest to anyone but accountants.

Not sure it's new this summer? We knew all about the Maguire and Bowen add ons for instance.

It's of use because it tells us how much more money we could make from sales.
 
Not sure it's new this summer? We knew all about the Maguire and Bowen add ons for instance.

It's of use because it tells us how much more money we could make from sales.

No Syd, it's so you can act like a silly **** and pretend to be itk. Didn't you know?

Someone with the IQ of an amoeba said so earlier.
 
You guys keep telling X will be gone by the end of window etc. but I guess you are not aware that we have 14-15 senior players only. In order to start sending players we need at least 9 players. I feel like most of these players will stay here to cover the bench.
 
They don't matter really, if fans care that much about the value of the deal then one figure that we're definitely getting should suffice.

I never understood the whole "a three year deal with the option of a fourth". Well, what's the option for? If you want to give the player a new contract, give them one. If after three years you aren't sure if they should get a contract or not, you probably should let them go. Because how often is an option triggered just to squeeze money out of potential buyers? Is it not more profitable to accept an offer before the contract runs out?

Yeah I thought we seemed to be one of the first clubs to do this and it never really made sense. I suppose though it should add more value. For instance we sold Tufan with one year but an un-exercised extra year so theoretically had two years to run. It seems more for cash strapped clubs which we're (hopefully) not anymore.
 
You guys keep telling X will be gone by the end of window etc. but I guess you are not aware that we have 14-15 senior players only. In order to start sending players we need at least 9 players. I feel like most of these players will stay here to cover the bench.

Yes, they probably will. But that's fine as long as the key positions get filled like the look like they will.
 
I'd be amazed if it wasn't an undisclosed fee and grammar boy will know as much as any other twitter nonce desperately trying to pretend they are in the know.

Ultimately it doesn't matter. It should be a private transaction anyway. In what other business do people jump over themselves to know how much one business has paid another for an asset?

Material transactions are usually disclosed in Financial Statements.
 
Really? The first 70 mins was as bad as we've played in a long time.
I still enjoyed it. Fiorentina played some nice stuff. I can still enjoy a game without it being a classic. Was nice to spend time with the family and just be back at the stadium again tonight and saturday after a few months away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: springtiger
Yeah I thought we seemed to be one of the first clubs to do this and it never really made sense. I suppose though it should add more value. For instance we sold Tufan with one year but an un-exercised extra year so theoretically had two years to run. It seems more for cash strapped clubs which we're (hopefully) not anymore.

I'm not sure he did have an option year. You might want to check that.
 
I still enjoyed it. Fiorentina played some nice stuff. I can still enjoy a game without it being a classic. Was nice to spend time with the family and just be back at the stadium again tonight and saturday after a few months away.

Gotta be honest I watched most of that thinking were making as many backwards passes as Liam got trounced for.

It's amazing how unconscious bias can affect how we see things differently, isn't it?
 
Gotta be honest I watched most of that thinking were making as many backwards passes as Liam got trounced for.

It's amazing how unconscious bias can affect how we see things differently, isn't it?
There were nowhere near as many backwards passes tonight as any game I remember last season. Its time to let him go. If he is that good he will be ripping it up all over Europe for years to come and you can sleep soundly knowing you were right and he is the god.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Lynnes PBCW™