Odd for it to be so short term.
It's about right for his age and development stage, he hasn't proved himself fully yet and if/when he does he will see an improved deal offered
Odd for it to be so short term.
With young players, unless they are exceptional then a 3-year deal effectively is probably about right. I remember Jonny Margetts who came through the ranks, he was scoring for fun in the U23's, but after moves to Tranmere, Scunny and many others is now at Boston United. Cullen was another one, he did at least make a career for himself in the lower divisions.
If he succeeds then fine, if not then you have a get-out clause.
But it's only a 1 year deal with the option for an extension isn't it? So 2 years I guess.
Odd for it to be so short term.
He hasn’t broken through yet though, if he doesn’t it’s extra money on a player that doesn’t play.
Surely that's not the point though.I can't imagine his wage is anything remarkable.
I can't imagine his wage is anything remarkable.
So then why would we offer him a huge deal if he’s not broken through yet? The money isn’t the issue. You look at KLP, who has definitely broken through and proven himself a talent. Chadwick hasn’t done that yet and at 20, he will need to this year, either with us or out on loan. I suspect he will go out in January, and then if he does well, we can trigger the extra year.
I didn't suggest a huge deal, I suggested that a 3 year contract is usually pretty reasonable/standard. 1+1 from us is just quite strange that's all.
You must log in or register to see media
Nice that we are finally recognising our home grown players.
Tbf home grown talent for the most part being signed up on long term deals .. am I the only one that thinks Ehab is seeing pound signs before his eyes
Or being sensible and making sure we get a decent price instead of beingbstiffed like we have in the past? Other chairmen get praised for tying players to long term contracts yet some of our fans who have complained when we didn't do that are now complaining when we do.