Bitterness from a departing player is normally aimed at the manager that let him go, in this case it’s entirely aimed at the owner (who most of already knew was responsible).
I think this 'bitterness' is misplaced. Who ever arranged the Henrikson deal had our pants down and I'd say the person with more right to be bitter would be the person who signed the cheque to bring him here in the first place. Doubt if he will ever play at the level Hull City gave him the chance too, and captains arm band, again.
He was hit and miss, occasionally great, but regularly went missing during games. Some signings obviously work better than others, the real mistake here, was giving up the chance to get our money back and instead paying him almost a million quid to sit on his arse for a year.
'million quid to sit on his arse' just about sums up who should be the most bitter about this one and I don't think it should be Henrikson. The story I heard was that Henrikson refused to go to the club we had done the deal with, hence the falling out and him being kept on the sidelines.
Ehab turned down the £1.7m Bordeaux bid that would have seen us get most of our money back, as he thought he'd get a better offer, but it backfired (the move Henriksen turned down was to Russia later on).
Why should he go to a club he didn't want to go to? He's done **** all wrong. He's looked after his best interests. Ehab & Assam are ****s. They tried to be sneaky ****s (their normal behaviour) to gain a few more quid & failed. It's great that it cost them money, long may it continue.
