Summer 2014 Transfer rumour thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I do have to wonder why he won't name the players who are supposedly leaving. What's the point in being cryptic?
 
I do have to wonder why he won't name the players who are supposedly leaving. What's the point in being cryptic?

I'm not sure, he's not had problems naming names when it comes to bringing players in. Maybe it'd get in in trouble with whoever's giving him the information to be too obvious, while there's not much they can do about him being more vague. Either way, his track record is more deserving of the general "nah let's ignore him and pretend it's not happening" reaction from.. well, from the exact types you'd expect.

Come on Joey spill the beans. Who does your source work for?

Thought he already said that his source works on the player's side.
 
I'm happy to spill certain amounts. My source mentioned absolutely nothing about Lallana leaving (not to say something hasn't happened since...this was about 3 weeks ago now). My source has a financial interest in the player and has none whatsoever in Southampton Football Club although the 30m fee mentioned would appear to be bang on
 
Shaw to United makes sense. He is 18 and has the potential to be one of the best left backs in the world; potential! 25-30m for an 18 year old with very good potential is barmy and I can see the benefit in taking it. He could get injured in the next game. I can't see his value getting any higher with us because we are not likely to get Champions League football anytime soon. Therefore, the older he gets, the more his potential decreases as he is becoming closer and closer to his peak over the years. His value would need Champions League football to increase by another 10-20m. It is a risk free option for saints.

Selling him(with sell-on clause) and give the money to the manager to buy 3 of 4 new players. Then give him some other transfer budget (Osvaldo money - 7m ??) + 3m, gives another 10m to buy two or three more.

Now my numbers are hypothetical, but it is an astute way of financing 5 or 6 new players that will give us a deeper squad.

I'd be happy.
 
Shaw to United makes sense. He is 18 and has the potential to be one of the best left backs in the world; potential! 25-30m for an 18 year old with very good potential is barmy and I can see the benefit in taking it. He could get injured in the next game. I can't see his value getting any higher with us because we are not likely to get Champions League football anytime soon. Therefore, the older he gets, the more his potential decreases as he is becoming closer and closer to his peek over the years. It is a risk free option for saints.

Selling him(with sell-on clause) and give the money to the manager to buy 3 of 4 new players. Then give him some other transfer budget (Osvaldo money - 7m ??) + 3m, gives another 10m to buy two or three more.

Now my numbers are hypothetical, but it is an astute way of financing 5 or 6 new players that will give us a deeper squad.

I'd be happy.

But if Shaw, Lallana and Morgan go will you be happy?
 
As I stated about 3 days before the story came out (to a general consensus of doubt and anger), the deal is as good as done for Shaw and my source has nothing to do with the club per se.

Stop being a dick Cortese. :p
 
Selling him(with sell-on clause) and give the money to the manager to buy 3 of 4 new players. Then give him some other transfer budget (Osvaldo money - 7m ??) + 3m, gives another 10m to buy two or three more.

Now my numbers are hypothetical, but it is an astute way of financing 5 or 6 new players that will give us a deeper squad.

I'd be happy.

All well and good, assuming that we have only £3m to spend without selling, which certainly isn't the case.

Also, if £10m gets you three players, we're not going to be challenging for Europe any time soon!
 
As I stated about 3 days before the story came out (to a general consensus of doubt and anger), the deal is as good as done for Shaw and my source has nothing to do with the club per se.

Look, either name names or don't bother saying this ****.
 
Look, either name names or don't bother saying this ****.

I'm keeping records of all the "ITK" rumours that I see, starting with his. If he's right, then fair enough. Should make for interesting results come the new season though.

If anyone has any they'd like to make me aware of, I'm happy to add them to the list!
 
I'm keeping records of all the "ITK" rumours that I see, starting with his. If he's right, then fair enough. Should make for interesting results come the new season though.

If anyone has any they'd like to make me aware of, I'm happy to add them to the list!

<laugh> a bit obsessive isn't it?

Are you a teacher, a quality manager, or a lawyer? :smile:
 
All well and good, assuming that we have only £3m to spend without selling, which certainly isn't the case.

Also, if £10m gets you three players, we're not going to be challenging for Europe any time soon!

Did you miss the word "Hypothetical?"....... what about it getting us 2 players (I said 2 or 3). 3 x Michu; 2 x 5m; 1 x 10m + the other money; I was generalizing that if Shaw went for a big fee, it wouldn't be a disaster.

I didn't specify and I didn't infer that we only had 3m to spend..... I was hypothesizing. You really do need to stop taking everything so literally.
 
If Shaw goes for £30m + add ons I wouldn't mind that much. If two or 3 players go(first teamers) I would want to know what the **** was going on.
 
Did you miss the word "Hypothetical?"....... what about it getting us 2 players (I said 2 or 3). 3 x Michu; 2 x 5m; 1 x 10m + the other money; I was generalizing that if Shaw went for a big fee, it wouldn't be a disaster.

I didn't specify and I didn't infer that we only had 3m to spend..... I was hypothesizing. You really do need to stop taking everything so literally.

I guess signing three Michus for £10m is hypothetical too, if by hypothetical you mean bearing no relationship to reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.