
Dont know if this has already been brought up but that mini judas defoe bit javier mascherano on the arm at upton park (west ham vs spurs ) the FA took no action even though it was caught on the tv, got to be some kind of presedence there i think. check it out on google.
All the Best
Brooking![]()
Wow I thought the Prime Minister comment was supposed to be a joke but they really did issue a statement.
#bigsociety
Liverpool fans will continue to idolise Suarez, so that's hypocritical for a start.
Secondly, non United fans respect him as a professional footballer, not as a man, in the main.
total bollox mate, ask any pro which they would prefer, to get smashed in the leg by dangerous play or the nibble.
Wow I thought the Prime Minister comment was supposed to be a joke but they really did issue a statement.
#bigsociety
That's a bollox argument Tobes. You can't separate the man from the professional footballer as they are one in the same entity.
Much has been made of the Suarez’s previous disciplinary offences but the FA is limited in this respect.
For example, the other biting incident in Holland, when Suarez was playing for Ajax, cannot be used against him as it was not under the jurisdiction of the English FA.
His previous record in England does not include any previous misdemeanours for violent conduct and so the FA is again limited as to how much emphasis they can place on his previous character.
Of course, there was the disgraceful racism incident involving Manchester United’s Patrice Evra and, whilst the FA disciplinary panel will take this into account, it is not a similar type of offence, i.e. violent conduct, and the impact on the penalty for his latest escapade will be restricted.
Despite this, I believe that the FA will look to make an example of Suarez and can see him getting a penalty which is at least double the norm
That's a bollox argument Tobes. You can't separate the man from the professional footballer as they are one in the same entity.
So you can't say someone is a prick but they are also good at their job ?
May have to re evaluate my boss

I can separate them quite easily mate. I don't know Ryan Giggs & therefore don't have any knowledge of the mans character, aside from what I've read about him. What I read is that he spent years humping his brothers wife, which makes him a bit of a snake tbh. However, he's been a fantastic professional football who's going to continue playing until he's over 40 years of age in the toughest league on the planet & for that he gets my total respect as a player, not as a man.
total bollox mate, ask any pro which they would prefer, to get smashed in the leg by dangerous play or the nibble.
Intent, means nothing to those who've been smashed, ask the player McManaman smashed in the knee, he was well pissed off even though the intent was not there, yours is a viewpoint of a person who's never been on the end of a bad tackle, I've suffered a few and would in hindsight have preferred a nibble any day
Not condoning Suarez, and if I was Ivanovic I would feel the same, but to try and say depending, a dangerous tackle is less of an offence is a comical farce of a defence of one's viewpoint

I can separate them quite easily mate. I don't know Ryan Giggs & therefore don't have any knowledge of the mans character, aside from what I've read about him. What I read is that he spent years humping his brothers wife, which makes him a bit of a snake tbh. However, he's been a fantastic professional football who's going to continue playing until he's over 40 years of age in the toughest league on the planet & for that he gets my total respect as a player, not as a man.
Interesting article with regards to the punishment that Suarez could face:
Luis Suarez could be handed severe punishment through misconduct loophole, says former FA Compliance Officer Graham Bean
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...former-FA-Compliance-Officer-Graham-Bean.html
Here is an extract:
Nah Tobes. The 2 parts of his life cannot be separated. That is just an accommodation that you are making - it doesn't exist.
But the prick still remains the prick even if he is good at his job. So Suarez is a fool and Giggs is a philanderer but they both play football![]()
Sheila Coleman (spokes person for the Hillsborough Justice campaign) not happy on twitter about the 'donation' of the fine money by Suarez.
How can he dictate where his fine money is to go? He's fined by the club, if they're going to make a donation then fine.....so I understand her being upset by the PR element of this tbh.
Sheila Coleman (spokes person for the Hillsborough Justice campaign) not happy on twitter about the 'donation' of the fine money by Suarez.
How can he dictate where his fine money is to go? He's fined by the club, if they're going to make a donation then fine.....so I understand her being upset by the PR element of this tbh.