Suarez

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What would you like to happen now?

  • Defend Suarez publicly, keep him

  • Condemn Suarez publicly, keep him

  • Stay neutral, keep him

  • Defend Suarez publicly (for now), sell him in the Summer

  • Condemn Suarez, sell him in the Summer

  • Stay neutral, sell him in the Symmer

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
astroturfnaut said:
Agree with that, though I think Suarez was just being clumsy in his tweet (the English was poor) rather than trying to make PR of it.
Click to expand...

You think he typed that himself mate? Ok.

It's orchestrated PR & she's upset with the club for using the campaign & describes it as 'cynical'
 
What ever the FA plan on doing I hope they do it soon. What ever the ban is going to be I want to get it started as soon as possible ao Luis does not miss many games for start of next season. Assuming he is still playing for us of course
 
tommynewberry said:
What ever the FA plan on doing I hope they do it soon. What ever the ban is going to be I want to get it started as soon as possible ao Luis does not miss many games for start of next season. Assuming he is still playing for us of course
Click to expand...

No chance. It will get dragged out for the next five or six weeks so it effects next season.
 
The FA has (as expected) charged Liverpool striker Luis Suarez with violent conduct.

A statement on their website reads as follows:

"The FA has charged Liverpool forward Luis Suarez with violent conduct.

"The charge follows an incident with Chelsea’s Branislav Ivanovic in yesterday’s fixture at Anfield [21 April 2013].

"The incident was not seen by the match officials and has therefore been retrospectively reviewed

"It is alleged that the conduct of Suarez constitutes violent conduct and it is The FA’s contention that the standard punishment of three matches that would otherwise apply is clearly insufficient in these circumstances.

"Suarez has until 6pm on Tuesday 23 April to respond to the charge, thereafter an Independent Regulatory Commission will be convened this Wednesday, 24 April."
 
Bluff City Red said:
The FA has (as expected) charged Liverpool striker Luis Suarez with violent conduct.

A statement on their website reads as follows:

"The FA has charged Liverpool forward Luis Suarez with violent conduct.

"The charge follows an incident with Chelsea’s Branislav Ivanovic in yesterday’s fixture at Anfield [21 April 2013].

"The incident was not seen by the match officials and has therefore been retrospectively reviewed

"It is alleged that the conduct of Suarez constitutes violent conduct and it is The FA’s contention that the standard punishment of three matches that would otherwise apply is clearly insufficient in these circumstances.

"Suarez has until 6pm on Tuesday 23 April to respond to the charge, thereafter an Independent Regulatory Commission will be convened this Wednesday, 24 April."
Click to expand...

I obviously agree that he should be banned for more than three games but yet again we see the FA changing their own rules to suit <doh>
 
Since there are almost 750 comments on this thread I am sure someone will have said this already but...thank **** he bit a white player <whistle>
 
Gerrez said:
Since there are almost 750 comments on this thread I am sure someone will have said this already but...thank **** he bit a white player <whistle>
Click to expand...

or does he not bite black players beca......... oh **** it, always lose out anyway!!!!
 
So how long do you think a fair ban will be? Personally think a 4-8 game would make enough of a point.
 
Bluff City Red said:
The FA has (as expected) charged Liverpool striker Luis Suarez with violent conduct.

A statement on their website reads as follows:

"The FA has charged Liverpool forward Luis Suarez with violent conduct.

"The charge follows an incident with Chelsea&#8217;s Branislav Ivanovic in yesterday&#8217;s fixture at Anfield [21 April 2013].

"The incident was not seen by the match officials and has therefore been retrospectively reviewed

"It is alleged that the conduct of Suarez constitutes violent conduct and it is The FA&#8217;s contention that the standard punishment of three matches that would otherwise apply is clearly insufficient in these circumstances.

"Suarez has until 6pm on Tuesday 23 April to respond to the charge, thereafter an Independent Regulatory Commission will be convened this Wednesday, 24 April."
Click to expand...

I think he should plead insanity. He'll get away with it then for sure.
 
Style said:
So how long do you think a fair ban will be? Personally think a 4-8 game would make enough of a point.
Click to expand...

Just said this on the Chelsea board:

Gerrez said:
I said he should get ten games. However, I can't make my mind up whether the FA will bottle it or make an example of Suarez. I would predict five games for the former and ten for the latter.

Edit: Barton got twelve games for three potential red card offences in the space of thirty seconds!
Click to expand...
 
Style said:
So how long do you think a fair ban will be? Personally think a 4-8 game would make enough of a point.
Click to expand...

3-4 games, considering Ivanovic wasn't even hurt by him. If he'd have actually taken a chunk out of him then I think we'd be talking about a 6 monthly, yearly or even life ban. But no harm was done so I don't think the ban should be very long.
 
Lucaaas said:
3-4 games, considering Ivanovic wasn't even hurt by him. If he'd have actually taken a chunk out of him then I think we'd be talking about a 6 monthly, yearly or even life ban. But no harm was done so I don't think the ban should be very long.
Click to expand...

Can I take a bite out of your avatar?
 
Gerrez said:
I said he should get ten games. However, I can't make my mind up whether the FA will bottle it or make an example of Suarez. I would predict five games for the former and ten for the latter.
Click to expand...

Also known as 2.5 TRBs* <ok>

*Terry Racism Bans
 
I ain't no fan of Liverpool.
I'm a Palace fan and was at Anfield as a youngster when we got beat 9-0.
This lark with Suarez is turning into a witch hunt now though.
What Callum McManaman did was far worse but I don't think he was even carded....correct me if I'm wrong. Which I rarely am.
He is a total ****ing nutter but a great player.
Suarez, not McManaman that is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back