Suarez Charged

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am normally anti liverpool however credit were its due to their fans as I thought they would back him like normal, however the general thoughts from their end is anti him and how they can't defend him.
Granted you could find a clown who would but in general it's a good response



QUOTE=Its The Hope That Kills;4622812]http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22250458

Liverpool striker Luis Suarez has been charged with violent conduct by the Football Association for biting Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic.
The incident happened during the 2-2 draw between the Reds and Chelsea.

An FA statement said the match officials had not seen the incident and it had been "retrospectively reviewed". It added that, while the standard punishment for violent conduct was a three-match ban, that was "clearly insufficient in these circumstances".
Suarez has until 18:00 BST on Tuesday, 23 April to respond to the charge before an independent regulatory commission will be convened on Wednesday, 24 April.

Suarez has apologised for biting the defender and, although the Anfield club have fined him, they insist the Uruguayan still has a future with them.[/QUOTE]
 
When you live on a farm
And you bite someone's arm
That's a Suarez
When your forehead is wide
And your teeth are offside
That's a Suarez
When you dive for a pen
Over and over again
That's a Suarez
When your gums are so tight
Like you've strained for a ****e
That's a Suarez
 
How sick is this?

Liverpool Union @LiverpoolUnion

I don't care if Suarez bit him I'll always support him 100% even if murdered a child he'd have my full support
 
Agent Bruce said:
How sick is this?

Liverpool Union @LiverpoolUnion

I don't care if Suarez bit him I'll always support him 100% even if murdered a child he'd have my full support
Click to expand...

<laugh> Really? FFS man. Whereas I think the Luis Suarez stuff is being blown out of all proportion, that kind of comment is just moronic.

I have to say I think his reputation is hurting him here. Defoe got off scot free and his was a proper gnash on! Suarez is unscrupulous and a cheat (like a lot of South Americans - he has been taught some of this), but he is higher on my like list than Callum McManaman. At end of the day a little nibble on the arm, no real harm done. Leg breaking force of a McManaman or De Jong is a lot worse for me. We have some strange ideals in this country at times.
 
The fact that he says he doesn't believe he deserves more than a 3 game ban leaves the door open for him to appeal and possibly play on Saturday. Whether Liverpool allow him to appeal or not will say a lot about their intentions for the summer. If they are keeping him, then if I was Brendan Rogers I'd prefer him to miss 4 games this season than next, and so would just have him getting on with the ban asap.
 
Albert's Chip Shop said:
When you live on a farm
And you bite someone's arm
That's a Suarez
When your forehead is wide
And your teeth are offside
That's a Suarez
When you dive for a pen
Over and over again
That's a Suarez
When your gums are so tight
Like you've strained for a ****e
That's a Suarez
Click to expand...

Put the music to that and you've got a hit on your hands.
 
Banned for 10 games.

My concern is that Liverpool will appeal, in which case there will be a hearing probably next week, which might mean he could play against us? I'm not sure exactly how it works.
 
I'm pretty sure that's right.

If somehow the appeal hadn't been determned by the time the 4th game came around he might be able to play in that, but if he agrees that a 3 match ban is appropriate, he has got to serve them
 
Freddd said:
I'm pretty sure that's right.

If somehow the appeal hadn't been determned by the time the 4th game came around he might be able to play in that, but if he agrees that a 3 match ban is appropriate, he has got to serve them
Click to expand...

He accepted 3 games. Definitely not playing! Confirmed on Sky. Deserves his punishment and should just accept it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back