Suarez Charged

I am normally anti liverpool however credit were its due to their fans as I thought they would back him like normal, however the general thoughts from their end is anti him and how they can't defend him.
Granted you could find a clown who would but in general it's a good response



QUOTE=Its The Hope That Kills;4622812]http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22250458

Liverpool striker Luis Suarez has been charged with violent conduct by the Football Association for biting Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic.
The incident happened during the 2-2 draw between the Reds and Chelsea.

An FA statement said the match officials had not seen the incident and it had been "retrospectively reviewed". It added that, while the standard punishment for violent conduct was a three-match ban, that was "clearly insufficient in these circumstances".
Suarez has until 18:00 BST on Tuesday, 23 April to respond to the charge before an independent regulatory commission will be convened on Wednesday, 24 April.

Suarez has apologised for biting the defender and, although the Anfield club have fined him, they insist the Uruguayan still has a future with them.[/QUOTE]

 

Always wondered why with all his money, Suarez never got his goofy front teeth fixed, now l know why...

They are all the better to bite you with my dear.

 

Now where have I heard that before.

The madman had quite a bit of coverage on TV tonight, he didn't come out of it too well.

 

When you live on a farm
And you bite someone's arm
That's a Suarez
When your forehead is wide
And your teeth are offside
That's a Suarez
When you dive for a pen
Over and over again
That's a Suarez
When your gums are so tight
Like you've strained for a ****e
That's a Suarez

 

How sick is this?

Liverpool Union @LiverpoolUnion

I don't care if Suarez bit him I'll always support him 100% even if murdered a child he'd have my full support

 

.

 

Really? FFS man. Whereas I think the Luis Suarez stuff is being blown out of all proportion, that kind of comment is just moronic.

I have to say I think his reputation is hurting him here. Defoe got off scot free and his was a proper gnash on! Suarez is unscrupulous and a cheat (like a lot of South Americans - he has been taught some of this), but he is higher on my like list than Callum McManaman. At end of the day a little nibble on the arm, no real harm done. Leg breaking force of a McManaman or De Jong is a lot worse for me. We have some strange ideals in this country at times.

 

What annoys me is the bastard's cashing in on his latest incident, he's launched a new footwear range.

please log in to view this image

 

That is disgusting, really is.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22273778

Liverpool striker Luis Suarez has accepted a charge of violent conduct from the Football Association for biting Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic and the case will be heard on Wednesday. However, the Uruguay international does not think he should be banned for longer than three games.

 

The rest of this season and the first three games of next season.

 

That wouldn't surprise me. Would match the Dutch suspension and would still avoid leaving them open to the charge of treating biting more seriously than racism.

 

7 must be his lucky number, it's his team number too.

 

The fact that he says he doesn't believe he deserves more than a 3 game ban leaves the door open for him to appeal and possibly play on Saturday. Whether Liverpool allow him to appeal or not will say a lot about their intentions for the summer. If they are keeping him, then if I was Brendan Rogers I'd prefer him to miss 4 games this season than next, and so would just have him getting on with the ban asap.

 

Put the music to that and you've got a hit on your hands.

 

Banned for 10 games.

My concern is that Liverpool will appeal, in which case there will be a hearing probably next week, which might mean he could play against us? I'm not sure exactly how it works.

 

He can only appeal against the extra 7 game ban not the mandatory 3 games.

 

This - He admitted a violent conduct charge. That carries an automatic 3 game ban with immediate effect. He will not be playing Saturday.

 

I'm pretty sure that's right.

If somehow the appeal hadn't been determned by the time the 4th game came around he might be able to play in that, but if he agrees that a 3 match ban is appropriate, he has got to serve them

 

He accepted 3 games. Definitely not playing! Confirmed on Sky. Deserves his punishment and should just accept it.