Sporting Integrity

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Nice loophole - so next time a team wins a first leg 4-0, and is losing 5-0 in the return leg - they can field an ineligible player so that UEFA apply their 'standard' 3-0 score line - and therefore promote that team through to the next round (despite the fact they would have lost had they not fielded the ineligible player).

Do you honestly believe this is coincidence!?

There are backhanders going on somewhere - either that are UEFA are a complete bunch of incompetent fools.
 
Us getting through is pure filth, they pumped us, but Legia only have themselves to blame for being stupid ****s, and there certainly was no conspiracy.
 
MalteseMick said:
Us getting through is pure filth, they pumped us, but Legia only have themselves to blame for being stupid ****s, and there certainly was no conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Fully agree on points 1 and 2. Point 3 if correct means UEFA haven't got a clue how to maintain sporting integrity.
 
Is very very funny. Sevconians, who have emerged from cover in the past ten days and suddenly wanted to talk football are again in a permarage muttering about conspiracies. Apparently Peter Lawell runs the world.
 
barneybattles said:
Is very very funny. Sevconians, who have emerged from cover in the past ten days and suddenly wanted to talk football are again in a permarage muttering about conspiracies. Apparently Peter Lawell runs the world.
Click to expand...

He always has.
 
<laugh>

This **** is actually ******ed. Why would any team who won a first leg by 3 or more goals deliberately put an ineligible player in the squad?

Legia ****ed up, Celtic were the team who benefitted from it. End of ****ing story.
 
VenomPD said:
<laugh>

This **** is actually ******ed. Why would any team who won a first leg by 3 or more goals deliberately put an ineligible player in the squad?

Legia ****ed up, Celtic were the team who benefitted from it. End of ****ing story.
Click to expand...


<laugh>

Guess you cant read - Team A win leg 1 4-0, Team A losing second leg 5-0 - throw on an ineligible player. Leg 2 awarded 3-0 to team b (consistent rule by UEFA) - team A go through 4-3 (rather than lose 5-4).

Don't tell me - rule wont be applied as Team A benefits from cheating.

Anyone who is happy to progress in this way clearly does not value competition and progression through performance.
 
Pricy147 said:
Nice loophole - so next time a team wins a first leg 4-0, and is losing 5-0 in the return leg - they can field an ineligible player so that UEFA apply their 'standard' 3-0 score line - and therefore promote that team through to the next round (despite the fact they would have lost had they not fielded the ineligible player).

Do you honestly believe this is coincidence!?

There are backhanders going on somewhere - either that are UEFA are a complete bunch of incompetent fools.
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting that if you were losing 5-0, you could play your trump card of fielding an ineligible player and get two goals chopped off. Really? <laugh><laugh><laugh>

VenomPD said:
This c**t is actually ******ed. Why would any team who won a first leg by 3 or more goals deliberately put an ineligible player in the squad?

Legia f**ed up, Celtic were the team who benefitted from it. End of f**ing story.
Click to expand...

No, I'm with him. His argument has no holes in it whatsoever. Firstly, it's only common sense to have at least one ineligible player on the bench at all times. And secondly, I'm sure he's right that UEFA would indeed punish the winning team for the losing team fielding an ineligible player.

Foolproof logic.
 
Of course we would rather play better and win, but a wins a win regardless of how you come about it!

That fact its clearly annoyed some people makes it all the better!
 
Pricy147 said:
<laugh>

Guess you cant read - Team A win leg 1 4-0, Team A losing second leg 5-0 - throw on an ineligible player. Leg 2 awarded 3-0 to team b (consistent rule by UEFA) - team A go through 4-3 (rather than lose 5-4).

Don't tell me - rule wont be applied as Team A benefits from cheating.

Anyone who is happy to progress in this way clearly does not value competition and progression through performance.
Click to expand...

aye, you're right, Celtic shouldn't go through coz they abide by the rules and Warsaw didn't.

You're a fanny. Seriously.
 
Pricy147 said:
<laugh>

Guess you cant read - Team A win leg 1 4-0, Team A losing second leg 5-0 - throw on an ineligible player. Leg 2 awarded 3-0 to team b (consistent rule by UEFA) - team A go through 4-3 (rather than lose 5-4).

Don't tell me - rule wont be applied as Team A benefits from cheating.

Anyone who is happy to progress in this way clearly does not value competition and progression through performance.
Click to expand...

UEFA would then rule the players suspension still stands.
 
Actual rule is "Any team sanctioned with a forfeit shall be deemed to have lost the match 3-0 (5-0 in futsal competetions), unless the actual result is less favourable to the member association or club, in which case it will stand"

So that'll be a fail from the Pricymeister. <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back