Ah, Chinese owners. Take note Gao apologists. I can't think of any successful Chinese owners in the game currently. It was a fad for them a few years ago, but now they all seem to have lost interest.
No but he started the decline without a doubt. In fairness the first relegation isn't really the fault of SR, they can maybe take 20% of the blame for that.Even if what you say is true .
Suppose GAO was interested in the slightest of investing in Saints ( I think he was ) , the fact remains his own govt prevented him from doing so .
And we never got relegated under him .
Even if what you say is true .
Suppose GAO was interested in the slightest of investing in Saints ( I think he was ) , the fact remains his own govt prevented him from doing so .
And we never got relegated under him .
No but he started the decline without a doubt. In fairness the first relegation isn't really the fault of SR, they can maybe take 20% of the blame for that.
The mess that has followed, and is worsening, is what they need to be held accountable for.
I’m sure GAO had good intentions. But fact is - for whatever reason - he couldn’t/wouldn’t invest.
And when he took us over, relegation wasn’t even something being considered. He took us from regular top 8 team, playing in Europe and a major final, to being inevitable relegation fodder.
By not investing a penny for 2/3 years. For a club like Saints in the PL that is nailed on relegation eventually.Started it in what way ?
What should he have done then ?
Oh ok .Not bought us in the first place.
By not investing a penny for 2/3 years. For a club like Saints in the PL that is nailed on relegation eventually.
Oh ok .
I know that, but whether it was his choice or not, it is still what led to the downfall of the club.He couldn’t .
20%?! They managed the window, wasted money on inexperienced players, left Ralph in charge for too long then hired Nathan ****ing jones, then replaced him with Selles.No but he started the decline without a doubt. In fairness the first relegation isn't really the fault of SR, they can maybe take 20% of the blame for that.
The mess that has followed, and is worsening, is what they need to be held accountable for.
If new owners took us over today, even reslly good ones, do you think everything would suddenly be resolved in a year? Of course not, the rot is too deep and it would take time.20%?! They managed the window, wasted money on inexperienced players, left Ralph in charge for too long then hired Nathan ****ing jones, then replaced him with Selles.
We had declined under Gao but the biggest decline happened when SR came in.
I suppose last season was Gaos fault? And this season too? Let’s face it SR are **** owners and they have no idea how to run a club. I get that it’s more comfortable to say “it was inevitable because of gao” rather than “our new owners ****ed up”, but it’s the second not the first.
Interesting that it was said on the TSP this week by Alfie House;
Ankersen is still involved with Saints. He's Dragan's main football advisor across their owned clubs, and involved in all major decisions.
So much for him being carted off to Goztepe. I always suspected he was still sticking his oar in.
In theory, Spors reports to Phil Parsons, but I suspect Ankersen has some kind of supervisory role too.Who knows what his role is. You’d assume Spors is in charge of football decisions at Saints. Solak would’ve hired Spors so maybe that was an Ankerson decision or at least with his input, but Ankerson wouldn’t be involved day to day at Saints as that’s Spors’ job.
Interesting that it was said on the TSP this week by Alfie House;
Ankersen is still involved with Saints. He's Dragan's main football advisor across their owned clubs, and involved in all major decisions.
So much for him being carted off to Goztepe. I always suspected he was still sticking his oar in.