no idea ... i'm just showing ensil that found guilty is not neccesarily proven guilty, as he seems to like being the being the big man to a kid (lil jatt)
great political move there IRA numbers were boosted with people who would never have joined after people saw what the british had done
fair enough bad analogy ... even though the 6 were not members. But try explain to ensil people get found guilty without being proven guilty
On that note i'm off. Past experience would suggest you're probably **** stirring Ensil, but I could be wrong.
I am a supporter of another club and find the FA's stance hypocritical, misguided and trying to give off a "look at us we're so big and clever" look to the rest of Europe.
Mate, we've already had enough of your super smug sterile drivel. I know it is Christmas n'all but ffs
The FA used to be on the oppsite side of the scale thats why, around teh world they have a terrible record with raciial discrimination in the past, they are trying to undo that
I am in favour of a discussion from him of which he quite capable when he's not being a sterile asshole. Ensiluokkainen is 6.2, 350lbs skinhead wears a tutu has a poodle and gets his ass bleached
I'm sorry..But Suarez cannot go round calling people negrito this or that..I wouldn't put up with it at work so why should someone put up with it on the pitch? The same thing he got charged with is the same thing John Terry's getting charged with. When you start generalizing people by colour your treading a very fine line. So to say negrito is not offensive, no it isn't, but when you aim it at people it is.
Oh deary me! It used to be a little knowledge was a dangerous thing, it now appears a keyboard is the modern equivalent! Would this be the definition from the online talking dictionary? The same one that if you scroll down shows that the nearest Spanish translation actually means 'black child' according to what is hardly a reputable source. http://www.dictionarist.com/negrito There is a difference between being found 'guilty' (note the quotation marks that you failed to notice on the original post and can be used to imply irony) by a 3man FA panel and being PROVEN guilty under what we know to be a fair and legally recognized trial. Sepp Blatter 'found' there was no corruption within FIFA, but subsequent examination of the facts have since led to a special committee being set up to investigate. Now you are assuming that the FA have come to a decision that would stand up in a court of law, whereas many of us Liverpool fans- having been told by our club there is as little evidence as we originally believed- are now wondering exactly how Suarez was indeed found guilty, and are pledging to support him in the meantime. If you could please stop imposing yourself as some kind of moral and legal force then that would be appreciated as you are clearly neither. Also at what point did the term 'black' even become offensive? I have brown hair, will people eventually have to describe it as 'fine threadlike strands of a color produced by mixing *acceptable definition of red*, *acceptable definition of yellow*, and *acceptable definiton of black*, as of dark wood or rich soil'? There are definitely words with racist connotations out there but when do we get to the point where we can just use words for what they were designed for i.e. to describe things!
