Shearer's ebar

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
skalpel said:
Yeah, @GlitterOfficial is going to do some serious covert damage to those billions of people who have no idea that Gary Glitter is a convicted *****phile...
Click to expand...

I wasn't just on about his Twitter here, I meant all *****s and all social networking sites. In most other circumstances, I wouldn't be as bothered, but with websites such as these, it's only going to make it easier for them to groom potential victims.
 
If this is actually him, do you people honestly think he is going to start grooming young kids under the name GlitterOfficial? He would have to be the worlds dumbest person to declare himself officially to the world rather than using a fake name.
 
Amnesiac. said:
I wasn't just on about his Twitter here, I meant all *****s and all social networking sites. In most other circumstances, I wouldn't be as bothered, but with websites such as these, it's only going to make it easier for them to groom potential victims.
Click to expand...

True, social networking sites are havens for those folk.
 
skalpel said:
True, social networking sites are havens for those folk.
Click to expand...

Mind you on twitter, there is not a lot of privacy so if Glitter does do something wrong then people will notice that is is him, so therefore he would use a different name, wouldn't be surprised if its some ***** trying to put the blame on Glitter for their offences if something does happen.
 
Lewis Hamilton The F1 Legend said:
It's not about free speech, it's about him staying off social networking sites because he is a peadophile. Who knows what he is looking at. There could be 10 year old girls and boys on twitter who won't have a clue who he is.
Click to expand...

If he's been banned from such sites as part of his convictions, fair enough. Who cares what he's looking at? If someone puts it on twitter, it's there for the world to see, unless it's set to private then it's for whoever they allow. If he managed to groom a kid over twitter, which morals aside would be absolutely idiotic given that every single action is tracked and traceable, then the blame should also lie with the parents and even the gullible child who would probably get nowhere in life anyway.

Should we segregate everyone who has committed crimes against a specific group of people?
 
Strawberry Syrup said:
Mind you on twitter, there is not a lot of privacy so if Glitter does do something wrong then people will notice that is is him, so therefore he would use a different name, wouldn't be surprised if its some ***** trying to put the blame on Glitter for their offences if something does happen.
Click to expand...

Never though of that, jesus christ the police need to do something here.
 
Strawberry Syrup said:
Mind you on twitter, there is not a lot of privacy so if Glitter does do something wrong then people will notice that is is him, so therefore he would use a different name, wouldn't be surprised if its some ***** trying to put the blame on Glitter for their offences if something does happen.
Click to expand...

Highly doubt that, given how easy it would be to verify whether the account does indeed belong to Glitter.
 
Lewis Hamilton The F1 Legend said:
Never though of that, jesus christ the police need to do something here.
Click to expand...

This clearly is not the case, that sounds like an episode of Scooby Doo for heavens sake. Nobody is going to think they can pretend to be Gary Glitter and start grooming children online in the hope that the police will just go and arrest him instead <laugh>.
 
skalpel said:
This clearly is not the case, that sounds like an episode of Scooby Doo for heavens sake. Nobody is going to think they can pretend to be Gary Glitter and start grooming children online in the hope that the police will just go and arrest him instead .
Click to expand...

And I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling kids!
 
skalpel said:
This clearly is not the case, that sounds like an episode of Scooby Doo for heavens sake. Nobody is going to think they can pretend to be Gary Glitter and start grooming children online in the hope that the police will just go and arrest him instead <laugh>.
Click to expand...

Haha this. That would be daft!

Anyway, this is my last Gary Glitter post ;) haha. He doesn't deserve my thoughts. ****!
 
skalpel said:
This clearly is not the case, that sounds like an episode of Scooby Doo for heavens sake. Nobody is going to think they can pretend to be Gary Glitter and start grooming children online in the hope that the police will just go and arrest him instead <laugh>.
Click to expand...

Sorry, it was a bit over reactive.
 
How old where you all when you moved out of your parents house?

I'm near 20 now, and as soon as I get a job I'm thinking of moving out. I'd just like a place of my own.
 
Megadeth NUFC said:
How old where you all when you moved out of your parents house?

I'm near 20 now, and as soon as I get a job I'm thinking of moving out. I'd just like a place of my own.
Click to expand...

Dude, I still with my Mum. I earn quite a good wage, for my age. Ive got no thoughts of moving out. Living here I dont have to worry about bills etc <laugh> Plus, I get to afford plenty of nights out, and also afford to go away with friends. Heading over to Asia in July!

Although, I'm moving out in August by the looks of it when the t'mother packs off and moves back home to Canada!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back