Second Referendum

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The president is concerned with maintaining the EU hegemony over individual states and their wishes, aided by his commission who are sworn to EU first and their own nation second by their oath of office.
You surely would not think it better if they were committed to their own countries?
 
You surely would not think it better if they were committed to their own countries?

What? I would not think it better for politicians elected to represent their own country, represent their own citizens or in politics to represent their own constituents?
erm yes I would, and the EU second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
What? I would not think it better for politicians elected to represent their own country, represent their own citizens or in politics to represent their own constituents?
erm yes I would, and the EU second.
But the EU is a partnership between sovereign states. You need to have a body independent of the states but appointed by them to make sure the Treaties are applied fairly. The Council of Ministers, the Commission and the Parliament all contribute to that.
If you join a club, get appointed to its committee and then act in your own interests you are probably committing a criminal offence.
 
But the EU is a partnership between sovereign states. You need to have a body independent of the states but appointed by them to make sure the Treaties are applied fairly. The Council of Ministers, the Commission and the Parliament all contribute to that.
If you join a club, get appointed to its committee and then act in your own interests you are probably committing a criminal offence.


None of what you say matters in relation to how the body functions. For example once something becomes an EU law, the Parliament has no ability to propose a change to this law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
I think this illustrates the difficulty in bridging the gap between remain and leave.
Anyone who sees the EU as some sort of external body acting in its own interest at the expense of its members will certainly disagree with those of us who think it is an important step towards greater collaboration between nations.
 
Turkey... government massacred its own civilians over park protests, government purged all opposition, from teachers to ministers and doctors judges ect. Aids ISIS. Commits war crimes. Hell bent on massacring Kurds

This lunatic state is coming to the EU.

Wow

No they're not.

Another example of Leave scare tactics I'm afraid.

Edit: didn't see previous exchange on this
 
Last edited:
The European Council = meeting of the member states when the leaders of each Member State are in attendance

The Council = when it's the ministers for the policy area being discussed attending
Decisions made at this stage is done almost entirely by Qualified Majority Voting. This means the UK Gov can vote against a proposal and as long as it receives enough votes from the other Member States it becomes law in the UK anyway

Remind me where UK citizens get a shout in this
 
None of you know anything about the EU, and it is shocking given your strong opinions on it, truly shocking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
As I have just demonstrated (and stated earlier) with how decisions on policy work, for UK citizens to effect change, they would have to work with citizens of the majority of other member states to effect change, and that is nigh impossible.
 
None of what you say matters in relation to how the body functions. For example once something becomes an EU law, the Parliament has no ability to propose a change to this law.
But that is exactly because the EU is set up by a Treaty between nation states so all its powers come from delegations from those states' governments. If the Parliament could make laws then the states would be subservient to it.
 
Ergo, the appearance of democracy, but to effect true democracy the EU citizenry (no such thing) would have to vote on matters as a block, and that does not and will not ever happen, or be allowed to happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Are we getting it? If you wanted to get a regulation\policy passed that fits your country, you need the support of 10s of millions of people from other countries, to pass a law for the UK :D

Democratic? lmfao
 
Ergo, the appearance of democracy, but to effect true democracy the EU citizenry (no such thing) would have to vote on matters as a block, and that does not and will not ever happen, or be allowed to happen


There’s no real democracy in the UK, for example. Any government will be elected by a minority of the voters, but then have control over all decisions affecting the population.
 
But that is exactly because the EU is set up by a Treaty between nation states so all its powers come from delegations from those states' governments. If the Parliament could make laws then the states would be subservient to it.

How does that make it democratic or serve the interests of any member state though

We are talking a democratic context. I don't care how it was set up, I care how it operates
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
None of you know anything about the EU, and it is shocking given your strong opinions on it, truly shocking.
It's a major error to assume that because people have a different viewpoint they are somehow ignorant of the facts. Although I do think it is true that only a tiny proportion of the voters on either side understood what the implications were.