One thing's for sure, currently, Norwich City are s***.
We really are **** at the moment. It gives me absolutely no pleasure whatsoever to say so, but I call a spade a spade.
I think one of the big problems is a lack of leadership on and off the pitch. Questionable tactics off and poor organisation on.
Totally agree with Jedi's comments about Bennett.
Our defence is an absolute joke! They can all **** right off. I know a lot of you on here love to lick Russell Martin's arsehole but the guys an absolute ****cunt! Where is the leadership in the team? It's non existent!
Don't sit on the fence, tell us what you really think!Don't sit on the fence, tell us what you really think!
No worries about that mate, fair play for having an opinion too.No worries about that mate, fair play for having an opinion too.
Que dramatic I'm going to leave the forum posts....
Out of interest do you include Michael Turner in your earlier statement? You won't find me arguing that Whittaker is incompetent and Olsson looks nothing like he did last season or that Martin isn't cut out to be a great CB but in my opinion Turner has hardly put a foot wrong since sometime in 2012!
Martin either needs to play a RB or not at all. Having said that the reason we are dropping so many points is our inability to take the chances we are creating.
Don't forget, adams wasn't picking Ryan Bennett earlier in the season. His first start of the season was cut short by injury at ipswich. Whilst I'd play him, what makes people so sure he'd walk straight into the team under Adams?
As Billy has highlighted I don't know what the deal is with the back up defenders, but it's not just the back four that are causing the problems, I find our defensive midfielders a tad indecisive sometimes.
That's a big concern for me, does Adams have any idea what his best line-up is? Or even what formation suits us?
With the possible exception of Howson, we've either got defensive midfielders or attacking ones, nobody else is particularly well rounded. In a 4-4-2 neither central midfielder feels comfortable going forwards, and if they do they aren't doing it in an effective/intelligent manner. For me this is why we've got to play 4-2-3-1. Then Tettey, Johnson and O'Neill are in a more natural role, and we've got Howson, Wes or Vadis (when fit) in a dedicated central attacking role. It worked early on in the season, but injuries and cluelessness has meant we've lost our way.
When Adams came in, most people agreed that he talked a good game on the radio and saw things in the same way the fans did, so if things weren't working then at least he'd be likely to have some support. But the formation, the situation in defence, the way Hooper was absent for a long while, etc would kind of disagree with that. Can anyone understand what he's trying to do?